HomeIncome Tax Act 2025 Section 106 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 — Amount...
Section 106 · Aggregation

Section 106 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 — Amount Borrowed or Repaid Through a Negotiable Instrument or Hundi

By CA Rajat Agrawal Updated 04 Jul 2026 Chapter VI
📜 What the law says — Section 106, Income-tax Act 2025
106. (1) Where any amount (including interest thereof) is borrowed or repaid through a negotiable instrument or on a hundi, otherwise than an account payee cheque, or through any mode as specified by the Board in this behalf, the amount so borrowed or repaid (including interest paid on the borrowed amount) shall be deemed to be the income of the person borrowing or repaying, as the case may be, for the tax year in which the amount was borrowed or repaid. (2) Where the amount borrowed under sub-section (1) has been deemed to be the income of any person, such person shall not be liable to be assessed again in respect of such amount under that sub-section on repayment of such amount. Charge of tax.

In plain language

What Section 106 actually says

Section 106 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 is an anti-black-money, deeming provision. In plain words, if you borrow money or repay a loan through a hundi or any negotiable instrument — and you do it by any route other than an account payee cheque (or a mode the Central Board of Direct Taxes, CBDT, specifically permits) — then the entire amount is treated as your income in the tax year in which the borrowing or repayment took place.

The section is the 2025 Act's re-write of the old Section 69D of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It sits in the "aggregation of income / unexplained income" group of sections (alongside cash credits, unexplained investments and unexplained money). It is effective from 1 April 2026.

Why this rule exists

A hundi is a traditional Indian credit and money-transfer instrument used in informal (non-banking) trade for centuries. Because a hundi passes hand-to-hand and leaves no bank trail, the source and genuineness of the money are almost impossible for the tax department to verify. To force such lending into a traceable, formal channel, the law says: if you won't route it through an account payee cheque, we will treat the money as your taxable income.

Who it applies to

  • The borrower — the borrowed amount is deemed to be his income in the year of borrowing.
  • The person repaying — the repaid amount is deemed to be his income in the year of repayment.
  • It covers every taxpayer — individuals, HUFs, firms, LLPs and companies — whether or not they maintain regular books.

Key conditions and limits

  • Only two triggers: a negotiable instrument (promissory note, bill of exchange, cheque that is not account-payee, etc.) or a hundi.
  • The escape hatch is a single approved mode: an account payee cheque drawn on a bank (or any other mode CBDT notifies). Route the loan that way and Section 106 does not bite.
  • There is no minimum threshold. Unlike some cash provisions, Section 106 has no ₹20,000 floor — even a small hundi loan is caught.
  • Interest is included. The words "including interest thereof" mean the deemed income is principal plus interest paid on the hundi.

Protection against double taxation

Sub-section (2) is a relief. If the borrowed amount was already deemed to be your income when you took the loan, then the same amount will not be taxed a second time when you repay it. So the department cannot hit the same money twice under this section.

How it interacts with other sections

  • It works alongside the other deeming sections — cash credits (Sec 102, ex-68), unexplained investments (Sec 103, ex-69), unexplained money (Sec 104, ex-69A) and unexplained expenditure (Sec 105, ex-69C).
  • Income deemed under these unexplained-income sections is generally taxed at the special flat rate under Section 194/115BBE-equivalent (about 60% plus surcharge and cess, with no deductions or set-off) — verify the exact section number and rate in the 2025 Act before filing, as this is a punitive rate.

Practical implications

  • Never take or repay a business loan on a hundi. Insist on an account payee cheque, NEFT/RTGS or another banking channel with a clear trail.
  • Even genuine, fully-disclosed hundi borrowings get taxed — genuineness is not a defence; the mode of transaction alone triggers the deeming.
  • Traders in cloth, bullion and commodity mandis, where hundis are still common, are the most exposed — they should migrate fully to banking channels.
💡 Example

Worked example 1 (borrowing): Ramesh, a textile trader in Surat, borrows ₹5,00,000 from a financier on a hundi (not an account payee cheque) in FY 2026-27. Under Section 106(1), the whole ₹5,00,000 is deemed to be Ramesh's income for FY 2026-27. If this is taxed at the punitive special rate of 60% plus 25% surcharge and 4% cess (effective ~78%), his tax on this single loan could be roughly ₹3,90,000 — even though it was a genuine loan he intends to repay.

Worked example 2 (interest + repayment, no double tax): Suppose the ₹5,00,000 was already deemed as Ramesh's income when borrowed. Next year he repays ₹5,50,000 (₹5,00,000 principal + ₹50,000 interest) on the same hundi. Because the ₹5,00,000 principal was already taxed under sub-section (1), Section 106(2) protects it from being taxed again. However, the ₹50,000 interest paid on the hundi is part of the "amount repaid" and can be deemed income on repayment.

A relatable story: Priya inherited her father's spice-trading firm in Old Delhi, where borrowing on a hundi was routine — "a promise on paper, trusted for generations." Her new accountant warned her that under Section 106, the ₹8,00,000 hundi loan she took to buy stock would be treated as taxable income the moment she signed the hundi. Shocked, she cancelled it and instead took the loan by account payee cheque from the same lender. Same money, same lender — but because it now had a bank trail, Section 106 did not apply and she paid tax only on her actual profits.

AspectSection 106, Income-tax Act 2025Section 69D, Income-tax Act 1961 (old)
What is caughtBorrowing or repaying on a hundi or any negotiable instrument, not by account payee cheque / notified modeBorrowing or repaying on a hundi, otherwise than by account payee cheque
Deemed income ofBorrower (year of borrowing) or repayer (year of repayment)Same
InterestIncluded ("including interest thereof")Included via Explanation
Minimum thresholdNone — any amountNone
Escape routeAccount payee cheque, or mode specified by CBDTAccount payee cheque
Double taxationSub-section (2): not taxed again on repayment if already taxed on borrowingProviso gives same relief
Effective from1 April 2026Since 1975 (now replaced)

Related sections

Section 102 — Cash credits (unexplained sums, ex-68) Section 103 — Unexplained investments (ex-69) Section 104 — Unexplained money, bullion or jewellery (ex-69A) Section 105 — Unexplained expenditure (ex-69C) Section 69D (1961 Act) — Old equivalent of Section 106 Section 187 — Mode of accepting/repaying loans (account payee cheque rules)

Frequently asked questions

Is a genuine hundi loan still taxed under Section 106?
Yes. Section 106 taxes based on the mode of the transaction, not on whether the loan is genuine. Even a real, fully-documented hundi loan is deemed to be income if it is not routed through an account payee cheque or a CBDT-notified mode.
What is the safe way to take or repay a loan and avoid Section 106?
Use an account payee cheque, or another banking mode notified by the CBDT (such as NEFT/RTGS if permitted). Any transaction with a clear bank trail keeps you outside Section 106.
Does Section 106 apply to both the borrower and the lender?
It applies to the person borrowing (in the year of borrowing) and the person repaying (in the year of repayment). It is aimed at the party to the hundi transaction, not primarily at the lender receiving the money.
Is the interest on a hundi also taxed?
Yes. Section 106 expressly includes interest, so both the principal borrowed/repaid and the interest paid on the hundi form part of the deemed income.
Will the same amount be taxed twice — once on borrowing and again on repayment?
No. Sub-section (2) provides that if the borrowed amount has already been deemed as your income when borrowed, it will not be taxed again when you repay it.
Is there a minimum amount below which Section 106 does not apply?
No. Unlike some cash-transaction rules, Section 106 has no minimum threshold — any amount borrowed or repaid on a hundi/negotiable instrument outside approved modes is caught.
What is Section 106 the successor to in the old law?
Section 106 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 replaces Section 69D of the Income-tax Act, 1961, carrying forward the same anti-evasion principle with slightly broader wording covering negotiable instruments and CBDT-specified modes.
C
CA Rajat Agrawal
Chartered Accountant, EaseValue · Reviewed 04 Jul 2026
This explainer is prepared and reviewed by EaseValue's tax team, based on the text of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (as amended by the Finance Act, 2026).
Disclaimer: This page explains the law in general terms for education and is not professional advice. The Income-tax Act, 2025 takes effect from 1 April 2026; provisions, thresholds and interpretations may change. Please confirm your specific position with our team before acting.

💬 Discussion & questions

0 comments · Ask anything about this — a Chartered Accountant or the community will reply.

Have a doubt about this (Section 106)? Ask here 👇
Free · takes 20 seconds · our CA answers. No account needed.
Your name
Email (optional)
3 + 2 = ?
Posts appear after a quick moderation check. General information, not professional advice.
No comments yet — be the first to ask. 👆

Have a question on this?

Ask our CA how Section 106 applies to you.

💬 Ask our CA Browse the full Act →
💬