HomeIncome Tax Act 2025 Trusts, Charitable Institutions & Special Persons — Income-tax Act 2025 Section 308 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 — Charge...
Section 308 · Special persons

Section 308 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 — Charge of Tax in Case of Oral Trust

By CA Rajat Agrawal Updated 05 Jul 2026 Chapter XVII
📜 What the law says — Section 308, Income-tax Act 2025
308. (1) Where a trustee receives or is entitled to receive any income on behalf or for the benefit of any person under an oral trust, then, irrespective of anything contained in any other provision of this Act, tax shall be charged on such income at the maximum marginal rate. (2) For the purposes of this section, “oral trust” shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 303(3). 4. —Association of persons and body of individuals Method of computing a member’s share in income of association of persons or body of individuals.
🔎 Verify in the official Act — open the exact page in the PDF

In plain language

What Section 308 actually says

Section 308 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 deals with the "Charge of tax in case of oral trust." In plain words, it lays down that the income of a person who is appointed under an oral trust (that is, a trust not created by a properly written and executed document) shall be charged to income-tax at the maximum marginal rate — the highest rate of tax in the country — regardless of anything else in the Act.

This is a short but very powerful "override" provision. The words used are on the lines of "irrespective of anything contained in any other provision of this Act," which means it defeats the normal slab benefits, basic exemption limit and beneficiary-wise taxation that a properly documented trust might otherwise enjoy. It is a penal / deterrent charging section — its whole purpose is to remove any tax advantage from keeping a trust undocumented and informal.

What is an "oral trust"?

  • Definition by cross-reference: Section 308 does not define "oral trust" on its own — it borrows the meaning from Section 303 of the 2025 Act. The expression "oral trust" is defined in Section 303(3), and the "person appointed under an oral trust" is covered under Section 303(1)(e) (the representative-assessee framework).
  • Core idea: An oral trust is a trust (or a wakf) whose terms are not recorded in a duly executed instrument in writing, and where the required statement of the trust's terms has not been furnished to the Assessing Officer within the prescribed time.
  • The 1961 Act mirror: This corresponds almost exactly to the old Section 164A read with Section 160(1)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The concept and the rate have been carried forward unchanged; only the section number and drafting have been modernised.

Who does it apply to?

  • The trustee / person appointed under the oral trust — he is treated as a representative assessee and taxed in that capacity on the income he receives or is entitled to receive on behalf of the trust.
  • Private / family arrangements where property or funds are handed over "on trust" for someone (a minor child, a relative, a group of persons) but no written trust deed is executed and registered.
  • Undocumented wakfs and similar informal fiduciary arrangements historically fell within the same net under the 1961 law.

It does not apply to properly documented private trusts with a written deed where the beneficiaries and their shares are clearly identified — those are taxed under the normal representative-assessee rules.

Key conditions and how to escape the penal rate

  • Reduce it to writing and intimate the Assessing Officer: Under the equivalent 1961 scheme, if the trustee filed a statement in writing with the Assessing Officer setting out the purposes of the trust, particulars of the trustees, the beneficiaries and the trust property within the prescribed period (generally three months from the date the trust was declared), the trust ceased to be "oral" for tax purposes. The 2025 Act continues this documentary-compliance philosophy.
  • Beneficiary shares must be known: Even after documentation, if the individual shares of the beneficiaries are indeterminate or unknown, tax can still fall at the maximum marginal rate under the sister provision (Section 307 — charge where share of beneficiaries is unknown).
  • Consequence of non-compliance: If it stays oral, Section 308 bites and the whole income is taxed at the maximum marginal rate with no slab relief and no basic exemption.

What is the "maximum marginal rate"?

The maximum marginal rate means the rate of income-tax (including surcharge, if any, and cess) applicable to the highest slab of income for an individual, AOP or BOI. In practice this is a steep effective rate — commonly cited in the region of roughly 39% under the new regime and up to about 42.744% where the highest surcharge applies. Exact figures depend on the regime and surcharge that apply for the year, so treat these as indicative and confirm against the rate schedule in force for the relevant assessment year.

How it interacts with related sections

  • Section 303 supplies the definitions (representative assessee, oral trust, person appointed under an oral trust) that Section 308 relies upon.
  • Section 307 handles the closely-related situation of a trust where the shares of the beneficiaries are unknown or indeterminate — also charged at the maximum marginal rate.
  • Section 308 is part of Chapter XVII — Special Provisions Relating to Certain Persons, the chapter dealing with representative assessees and trust taxation.

Practical implications for taxpayers

  • Always execute a written trust deed. An oral or "understanding-based" family trust is a tax trap — the entire income is exposed to the highest rate.
  • Spell out beneficiaries and their exact shares to avoid both Section 308 and Section 307.
  • File the statement of trust terms with the Assessing Officer within the prescribed time to convert an oral arrangement into a recognised written trust.
  • For estate and succession planning, a documented, registered trust is not just cleaner legally — it can be dramatically cheaper on tax.
💡 Example

Worked example 1 — the cost of staying "oral." Suppose Mr. Sharma verbally hands over Rs. 40 lakh to his brother "to hold in trust" for Mr. Sharma's minor son, with no written deed and no statement filed with the Assessing Officer. The corpus earns Rs. 6,00,000 of interest and rental income in the year. Because this is an oral trust, Section 308 applies: the entire Rs. 6,00,000 is taxed at the maximum marginal rate with no slab benefit and no basic exemption. At an illustrative MMR of about 39%, the tax is roughly Rs. 2,34,000.

Worked example 2 — the same money, done right. Now assume the brother executes a written, registered trust deed naming the son as the sole, fully-identified beneficiary, and files the statement of terms with the Assessing Officer in time. The trust is no longer "oral," and the income can be assessed in a representative capacity as if it were the beneficiary's own income under normal rules. If the beneficiary has little other income, a large part of the Rs. 6,00,000 may fall within lower slabs or the basic exemption, cutting the tax to a fraction of the oral-trust outcome — a saving of well over Rs. 1,50,000 in this illustration, purely from documentation.

A short story. When their father passed away, two sisters, Anjali and Meera, agreed over a phone call that Anjali would "manage everything for both of us." No deed was written. For two years the rental income of the inherited shop was assessed as an oral trust at the maximum marginal rate, and the family paid far more tax than expected. On their CA's advice they finally executed a proper trust deed clearly stating a 50:50 share and intimated the Assessing Officer. From the next year the income was taxed in their individual hands at ordinary slab rates — the same money, a much smaller tax bill. The lesson: a handshake is not a tax plan.

AspectOral trust (Section 308)Documented trust with known shares
Written, executed trust deed?NoYes
Statement of terms filed with Assessing Officer?No / not in timeYes, within prescribed time
Beneficiaries & shares identified?Not required to trigger chargeYes, definite and known
Rate of taxMaximum marginal rate (highest slab + surcharge + cess)Normal slab rates in beneficiary's/representative capacity
Slab benefit / basic exemptionNot availableAvailable
1961 Act equivalentSection 164A r/w 160(1)(v)Section 161 / 160 representative assessee
Governing chapter (2025 Act)Chapter XVII — Special Provisions Relating to Certain PersonsChapter XVII

Related sections

Section 303 — Representative assessee and meaning of oral trust Section 307 — Charge of tax where share of beneficiaries is unknown Section 306 — Charge of tax on income of representative assessee Section 305 — Right of representative assessee to recover tax paid Section 304 — Liability of a representative assessee Section 164A (1961 Act) — Charge of tax in case of oral trust (old law)

Frequently asked questions

What is an oral trust under the Income-tax Act, 2025?
An oral trust is a trust whose terms are not set out in a duly executed written instrument and where the required statement of terms has not been furnished to the Assessing Officer in time. The meaning is taken from Section 303(3), and Section 308 charges its income at the maximum marginal rate.
At what rate is the income of an oral trust taxed?
It is taxed at the maximum marginal rate — the rate of tax applicable to the highest slab of income, including surcharge and cess. This means no slab benefit and no basic exemption apply.
Which section of the old Income-tax Act, 1961 is Section 308 equivalent to?
Section 308 of the 2025 Act corresponds to Section 164A read with Section 160(1)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The rate and concept are carried forward; only the numbering and drafting changed.
Can I avoid the maximum marginal rate on an oral trust?
Yes. Reduce the trust to a properly executed written deed, clearly identify the beneficiaries and their shares, and file the statement of trust terms with the Assessing Officer within the prescribed time. The trust then stops being 'oral' and is taxed under normal representative-assessee rules.
How is Section 308 different from Section 307?
Section 308 taxes the income of an oral (undocumented) trust at the maximum marginal rate, while Section 307 taxes trusts where the beneficiaries' shares are unknown or indeterminate. Both apply the maximum marginal rate but for different defects.
Does Section 308 apply to charitable trusts?
Section 308 targets private oral trusts. Genuine charitable and religious trusts are governed by their own registration and exemption regime; but any trust that remains oral and undocumented risks losing normal treatment and being taxed at the maximum marginal rate.
Is the maximum marginal rate really over 40%?
It can be. The maximum marginal rate includes the highest slab rate plus applicable surcharge and cess, which can reach roughly 39% under the new regime and up to about 42.744% where the top surcharge applies. Always confirm the exact figure for the relevant assessment year.
C
CA Rajat Agrawal
Chartered Accountant, EaseValue · Reviewed 05 Jul 2026
This explainer is prepared and reviewed by EaseValue's tax team, based on the text of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (as amended by the Finance Act, 2026).
Disclaimer: This page explains the law in general terms for education and is not professional advice. The Income-tax Act, 2025 takes effect from 1 April 2026; provisions, thresholds and interpretations may change. Please confirm your specific position with our team before acting.

💬 Discussion & questions

0 comments · Ask anything about this — a Chartered Accountant or the community will reply.

Have a doubt about this (Section 308)? Ask here 👇
Free · takes 20 seconds · our CA answers. No account needed.
Your name
Email (optional)
2 + 2 = ?
Posts appear after a quick moderation check. General information, not professional advice.
No comments yet — be the first to ask. 👆

Have a question on this?

Ask our CA how Section 308 applies to you.

💬 Ask our CA Browse the full Act →
💬