Section 512 · Miscellaneous
Section 512 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 — Publication of Information (Names) of Tax Assessees
By CA Rajat Agrawal
Updated 05 Jul 2026
Chapter XXIII
📜 What the law says — Section 512, Income-tax Act 2025
512. (1) If the Central Government is of the opinion that it is necessary or expedient
in the public interest to publish the names of any assessees and any other
particulars relating to any proceedings or prosecutions under this Act in respect
of such assessees, it may publish such names and particulars in such manner as it
thinks fit.
(2) No publication under this section shall be made for any penalty imposed under
this Act, until the time for filing an appeal under section 356 or 357 has expired and
no appeal has been filed, or if an appeal is filed, it has been disposed of.
(3) The names of the partners of the firm, directors, managing agents, secretaries
and treasurers, or managers of the company, or the members of the association, as
the case may be, may also be published under sub-section (1), if, in the opinion of
the Central Government, the circumstances of the case justify it.
Appearance by registered valuer in certain matters.
In plain language
What Section 512 actually says
Section 512 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 is titled "Publication of information respecting assessees in certain cases." In plain words, it gives the Central Government the power to publicly name and shame tax defaulters, evaders and offenders when it believes doing so is in the public interest. This is the modern re-enactment of Section 287 of the old Income-tax Act, 1961 — the substance is carried forward almost unchanged, with only updated cross-references and cleaner drafting.
The provision has three parts:
- Sub-section (1) — the core power: If the Central Government is of the opinion that it is necessary or expedient in the public interest, it may publish the names of any assessees and any other particulars relating to any proceedings or prosecutions under the Act, in whatever manner it thinks fit (newspapers, official gazette, the department's website, press releases, etc.).
- Sub-section (2) — the penalty safeguard: Where the matter relates to a penalty imposed under the Act, no name can be published until the time to file a first appeal (to the Commissioner/Joint Commissioner (Appeals) under the appeal provisions, i.e. sections 356–357) has expired without an appeal being filed, or, if an appeal was filed, until that appeal has been finally disposed of.
- Sub-section (3) — naming the people behind entities: In the case of a firm, company or other association of persons, the Government may also publish the names of the partners of the firm; the directors, managing agents, secretaries, treasurers or managers of the company; or the members of the association — if, in its opinion, the circumstances of the case justify it.
Who it applies to
- Any assessee — individuals, HUFs, firms, LLPs, companies, trusts and associations of persons — who is the subject of proceedings or prosecution under the Act.
- The persons "behind" an entity — partners, directors, key managerial persons and members — who can be named alongside the entity under sub-section (3).
Importantly, the power is discretionary and exercised by the Central Government (in practice, through the CBDT and the Income-tax Department), not automatically by every Assessing Officer. It is typically used in serious cases — large-scale evasion, willful default, high-value prosecutions, or habitual defaulters.
Key conditions and limits
- Public-interest test: Publication must be "necessary or expedient in the public interest." This is a subjective but real check — it is meant to deter evasion and protect the integrity of the tax system, not to embarrass ordinary taxpayers.
- Wait for the appeal window (penalty cases): The most important protection. A penalty is not final until appeal rights are exhausted, so names tied to penalties cannot be published prematurely.
- No fixed monetary threshold in the section itself: Section 512 does not prescribe a rupee limit. In administrative practice, the Department has released lists of large defaulters (for example, running into crores of rupees) rather than small taxpayers.
- Manner is flexible: "In such manner as it thinks fit" allows Gazette notifications, press notes, and online publication of defaulter lists.
How it interacts with related sections
- Appeal provisions (Sections 356–357): These define the first-appeal timeline that sub-section (2) hangs its penalty safeguard on. Until that window closes, penalty names stay confidential.
- Penalty and prosecution chapters: Section 512 is the "publicity" tool that sits on top of penalty and prosecution outcomes. It does not create liability; it publicises it.
- Confidentiality provisions: Ordinarily, tax information is confidential. Section 512 is a deliberate, narrow exception that lets the Government override secrecy in defined circumstances.
Practical implications
- Reputational deterrence: The real "penalty" of Section 512 is reputational — being listed publicly as a tax defaulter can damage a business's banking, credit and commercial relationships far beyond the tax demand itself.
- Directors and partners cannot hide behind the entity: Sub-section (3) means the individuals running a company or firm can be named too.
- File your appeal in time: For penalty matters, promptly filing a valid first appeal keeps your name out of publication until the appeal is decided.
- No new tax or interest: Section 512 does not add any rate, tax, interest or fee. It is purely a disclosure/publicity power.
💡 Example
Worked example 1 — a company and its directors. Suppose "Alpha Traders Pvt Ltd" is found, after assessment and prosecution, to have evaded tax on undisclosed income of ₹12 crore, with a penalty of ₹8 crore. The Central Government considers this a serious, high-value case and decides publication is in the public interest. Because a penalty is involved, it must wait until Alpha's appeal time under sections 356–357 lapses or the appeal is decided. Once that condition is met, under sub-section (1) it can publish "Alpha Traders Pvt Ltd — evaded tax on ₹12 crore, penalty ₹8 crore," and under sub-section (3) it can also name the company's directors, say Mr. X and Ms. Y, if the circumstances justify it.
Worked example 2 — the appeal safeguard in action. A partnership firm is levied a ₹40 lakh penalty. The firm files a first appeal within the allowed period. Even if the Department wants to publish the firm's name, sub-section (2) blocks any penalty-related publication until the appeal is disposed of. If the appeal later succeeds and the penalty is deleted, there is nothing left to publish.
Relatable story. Rakesh, who runs a mid-sized jewellery business, keeps hearing about "defaulter lists" in the newspaper and panics that a small ₹15,000 mismatch in his return could land his name in the papers. His CA reassures him: Section 512 is aimed at serious, large-scale cases the Government finds worth publicising in the public interest, penalty names can't be published while an appeal is pending, and the Department in practice targets big evaders — not routine, small taxpayers who are cooperating and appealing properly.
| Aspect | Position under Section 512, Income-tax Act 2025 |
|---|
| Corresponding old-law section | Section 287 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 |
| Who exercises the power | Central Government (via CBDT / Income-tax Department) |
| Trigger / test | "Necessary or expedient in the public interest" |
| What can be published | Names of assessees + particulars of any proceedings or prosecutions |
| Penalty-case safeguard [sub-sec (2)] | No publication until appeal time under Sections 356–357 expires or the appeal is disposed of |
| Persons behind entities [sub-sec (3)] | Partners, directors, managing agents, secretaries, treasurers, managers, members — if circumstances justify |
| Monetary threshold in the section | None specified (large cases targeted in practice) |
| Manner of publication | As the Government thinks fit — Gazette, press, department website, defaulter lists |
| Does it create tax/interest/fee? | No — it is a disclosure/publicity power only |
Related sections
Section 287 (Act of 1961) — the predecessor publication provision Section 356 — Appeals to the Commissioner/Joint Commissioner (Appeals) Section 357 — Procedure and time limits for the first appeal Section 476 — Prosecution provisions the publication can relate to Section 511 — Disclosure of information respecting assessees (related information power) Section 513 — Appearance by authorised representatives / connected miscellaneous provisions
Frequently asked questions
Can the Income-tax Department publish my name for a small tax default?
Legally the power is broad, but it is meant to be used only where publication is necessary or expedient in the public interest. In practice the Department targets large-scale evaders and serious defaulters, not routine small mismatches.
Can my name be published while my penalty appeal is still pending?
No. For penalty matters, sub-section (2) bars publication until the time to file a first appeal (under Sections 356–357) has expired without an appeal, or the appeal you filed has been finally disposed of.
Can directors and partners be named, not just the company or firm?
Yes. Sub-section (3) allows the Government to also publish the names of partners, directors, managing agents, secretaries, treasurers, managers or members if the circumstances of the case justify it.
Is Section 512 the same as the old Section 287?
Yes, it is the re-enacted version of Section 287 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The substance is retained, with modernised drafting and updated cross-references to the new appeal sections.
Does Section 512 impose any tax, penalty or fee?
No. Section 512 does not levy any tax, interest, penalty or fee. It is purely a power to publish names and particulars — the real consequence is reputational.
Where can such names be published?
The section says 'in such manner as it thinks fit,' which includes the Official Gazette, press releases, newspapers and defaulter lists on the Income-tax Department's website.
How can I avoid being named?
Cooperate with proceedings, pay or dispute demands properly, and file any first appeal within time — the appeal safeguard keeps penalty-related names confidential until the dispute is resolved.
C
CA Rajat Agrawal
Chartered Accountant, EaseValue · Reviewed 05 Jul 2026
This explainer is prepared and reviewed by EaseValue's tax team, based on the text of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (as amended by the Finance Act, 2026).
Disclaimer: This page explains the law in general terms for education and is not professional advice. The Income-tax Act, 2025 takes effect from 1 April 2026; provisions, thresholds and interpretations may change. Please confirm your specific position with our team before acting.
💬 Discussion & questions
0 comments · Ask anything about this — a Chartered Accountant or the community will reply.
Have a doubt about this (Section 512)? Ask here 👇
Free · takes 20 seconds · our CA answers. No account needed.
No comments yet — be the first to ask. 👆