HomeIncome Tax Act 2025 Section 246 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 — Power...
Section 246 · Administration

Section 246 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 — Power Regarding Discovery, Production of Evidence, etc. (Summons Powers)

By CA Rajat Agrawal Updated 04 Jul 2026 Chapter XIV
📜 What the law says — Section 246, Income-tax Act 2025
246. (1) The Assessing Officer, Joint Commissioner, Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Commissioner (Appeals), Commissioner or Principal Commissioner, or Chief Commissioner or Principal Chief Commissioner and the Dispute Resolution Panel referred to in section 275(17)(a), shall, for the purposes of this Act, have the same powers as are vested in a court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), when trying a suit in respect of the following matters:–– (a) discovery and inspection; (b) enforcing the attendance of any person, including any officer of a banking company and examining him on oath; (c) compelling the production of books of account and other documents; and (d) issuing commissions. (2) The powers conferred under sub-section (1) may also be exercised in respect of any person or class of persons by the following income-tax authorities (even when there are no proceedings pending with respect to such person or class of persons before them or any other income-tax authority):–– (a) any income-tax authority (not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax) notified by the Board in this behalf, for the purposes of making any inquiry or investigation in respect of an agreement referred to in section 159; (b) the Principal Director General or Director General or Principal Director or Director or Joint Director or Assistant Director for the purposes of making any inquiry or investigation in relation to any concealment of income, if he has the reason to suspect that any income has been so con- cealed, or is likely to be so concealed by such person or class of persons within his jurisdiction; and (c) the authorised officer referred to in section 247(1), before taking action under section 247(1)(i) to (vii), or during the course of such action, if he has reason to suspect that any income has been concealed, or is likely to be concealed by such person or class of persons within his jurisdiction. (3) Any income-tax authority exercising the powers referred to in sub-sections (1) and (2) may, subject to the rules made in this behalf, impound and retain in its custody for such period as it thinks fit any books of account or other documents63 produced before it in any proceeding under this Act. (4) The Assessing Officer or the Assistant Direc

In plain language

What Section 246 is all about

Section 246 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 gives income-tax authorities the same fact-finding powers that a civil court has under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). In plain words, it lets tax officers summon people, put them on oath, demand documents, inspect records and issue commissions when they are conducting any tax proceeding, inquiry or investigation. It is the direct successor to the well-known Section 131 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and effective 1 April 2026 it carries forward those "summons" powers into the new law.

The four core powers (CPC-style)

  • Discovery and inspection — asking a person to disclose and let the officer inspect books, documents or information (including in electronic/computer form).
  • Enforcing attendance — compelling any person, including an officer of a banking company, to appear and be examined on oath.
  • Compelling production of documents — requiring books of account and other documents to be produced.
  • Issuing commissions — appointing a person to record evidence or make a local inquiry on the officer's behalf.

Because these mirror a civil court, a false statement on oath before the officer can attract the same seriousness as lying in court.

Who can use these powers

The authorities named for regular proceedings include the Assessing Officer, Joint Commissioner, Joint Commissioner (Appeals), Commissioner (Appeals), Commissioner / Principal Commissioner, Chief Commissioner / Principal Chief Commissioner, and — notably new versus the 1961 language — the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).

Powers even without a pending case — the big change

Under Section 246(2), certain officers can exercise these powers "even when there are no proceedings pending" against a person or class of persons. This applies to:

  • Assistant Commissioner / Deputy Commissioner level officers making an inquiry or investigation;
  • senior Director/Director General level officials investigating concealed income;
  • an authorised officer connected to search-and-seizure action under Section 247 (the successor to the old Section 132), before or during that action.

This makes the investigative reach wider than the 1961 position, where the power was more tightly linked to an existing proceeding.

Impounding and retention of books

An officer exercising these powers may impound and retain books of account or other documents. Important safeguards apply: the Assessing Officer or Assistant Director must record written reasons for impounding, and can retain them only up to 15 days (excluding holidays). Retention beyond 15 days needs the prior approval of the specified approving authority. This prevents documents from being kept indefinitely without accountability.

How it interacts with other sections

  • Section 247 (search & seizure) — Section 246 supplies the summons/examination powers used alongside search operations.
  • Assessment sections — evidence gathered here feeds into scrutiny and best-judgment assessments.
  • Penalty & prosecution provisions — ignoring a valid summons, refusing to produce documents, or giving false evidence can expose a person to penalty and prosecution.

Practical implications for taxpayers

  • A summons under Section 246 is a legal order, not a request — appear on the date given or seek adjournment in writing with reasons.
  • Answer truthfully; statements are recorded on oath and can be used in assessment or appeal.
  • You may attend with, or send, an authorised representative (CA/advocate) and should keep records organised and reconciled.
  • If documents are impounded, ask for the reasons in writing and note the 15-day limit.
💡 Example

Worked example 1 — Scrutiny with a bank summons. Mr. Sharma's return shows income of ₹9,00,000, but his savings account received ₹18,00,000 in cash during the year. During scrutiny, the Assessing Officer issues a summons under Section 246 to Mr. Sharma to appear on oath and produce his bank statements and cash-book, and also summons the branch officer of his bank to confirm the deposits. Mr. Sharma explains ₹12,00,000 as documented business receipts but cannot explain ₹6,00,000. That ₹6,00,000 is added to income; taxed in the 30% slab it adds roughly ₹1,80,000 plus applicable surcharge and cess.

Worked example 2 — Impounding with the 15-day rule. During a survey-linked inquiry, an Assistant Director impounds a firm's sales ledger. She records written reasons the same day. The 15-day (holiday-excluded) clock starts. On day 14 she needs more time to reconcile entries, so she obtains prior sanction from the approving authority to retain the ledger further. Without that sanction, the firm would be entitled to have the ledger returned after 15 days.

Relatable story. Priya, a boutique owner, received a summons under Section 246 asking her to appear with her purchase invoices. She panicked, thinking it was a raid. Her CA explained it was simply the officer's power to gather evidence, like a court asking for records. Priya attended with her CA, produced neatly filed GST-matched invoices, answered honestly on oath, and the query closed with no addition. The lesson: a Section 246 summons is manageable when you keep clean records and respond on time.

AspectSection 246, Income-tax Act 2025
Nature of powerCivil-court powers under CPC, 1908
Discovery & inspectionYes
Enforce attendance / examine on oathYes (including bank officers)
Compel production of books/documentsYes (paper and electronic)
Issue commissionsYes
Authorities (proceedings)AO, JC, JC(A), CIT(A), PCIT/CIT, PCCIT/CCIT, DRP
Powers without pending proceeding [246(2)]Yes — AC/DC inquiry, Director/DG concealment probe, authorised officer u/s 247
Impounding of booksAllowed, with written reasons recorded
Retention limitUp to 15 days (excl. holidays); longer needs prior sanction of approving authority
1961 Act equivalentSection 131
Effective from1 April 2026

Related sections

Section 247 — Search and seizure Section 248 — Power to requisition books of account, etc. Section 253 — Power to call for information Section 268 — Faceless collection of information Section 159 — Inquiry before assessment Section 131 (1961 Act) — Corresponding old provision

Frequently asked questions

Is a Section 246 summons the same as a raid?
No. A summons only requires you to appear, give evidence on oath and/or produce documents. A search or raid is a separate power under Section 247 (the successor to the old Section 132).
Can I send my Chartered Accountant instead of appearing myself?
For producing documents you can generally send an authorised representative. But if you are summoned personally to be examined on oath, you must appear in person unless the officer permits otherwise.
What happens if I ignore a Section 246 summons?
Non-compliance is treated seriously and can attract penalty and, in some situations, prosecution, since the officer holds civil-court powers. Always respond or seek a written adjournment with reasons.
For how long can my books of account be kept after being impounded?
Generally up to 15 days (excluding holidays). The officer must record written reasons, and any retention beyond 15 days needs prior sanction of the approving authority.
Can the tax officer summon my banker?
Yes. Section 246 specifically allows enforcing the attendance and examination of any person, including an officer of a banking company, to confirm transactions.
Can these powers be used if no case is pending against me?
Yes, in defined situations under Section 246(2) — for example inquiries or investigations by specified officers even without any pending proceeding against you.
What is the old-law equivalent of Section 246?
It corresponds to Section 131 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, updated for the new administrative structure (including the Dispute Resolution Panel) and effective from 1 April 2026.
C
CA Rajat Agrawal
Chartered Accountant, EaseValue · Reviewed 04 Jul 2026
This explainer is prepared and reviewed by EaseValue's tax team, based on the text of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (as amended by the Finance Act, 2026).
Disclaimer: This page explains the law in general terms for education and is not professional advice. The Income-tax Act, 2025 takes effect from 1 April 2026; provisions, thresholds and interpretations may change. Please confirm your specific position with our team before acting.

💬 Discussion & questions

0 comments · Ask anything about this — a Chartered Accountant or the community will reply.

Have a doubt about this (Section 246)? Ask here 👇
Free · takes 20 seconds · our CA answers. No account needed.
Your name
Email (optional)
6 + 4 = ?
Posts appear after a quick moderation check. General information, not professional advice.
No comments yet — be the first to ask. 👆

Have a question on this?

Ask our CA how Section 246 applies to you.

💬 Ask our CA Browse the full Act →
💬