Section 456 · Penalties
Section 456 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 — Penalty for Failure by an Eligible Investment Fund to Furnish the Required Statement
By CA Rajat Agrawal
Updated 05 Jul 2026
Chapter XXI
📜 What the law says — Section 456, Income-tax Act 2025
456. If any eligible investment fund required to furnish a statement or any
information or document under paragraph 4 of Schedule I, fails to do so within
the time prescribed under the said paragraph, the income-tax authority prescribed
under the said paragraph may direct that such fund shall pay, by way of penalty, a
sum of ` 500000.
Penalty for failure to furnish information or document under section 171.
In plain language
What Section 456 is about
Section 456 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 imposes a fixed monetary penalty on an eligible investment fund that fails to furnish, within the prescribed time, the statement, information or document it is legally required to file in connection with the special "fund manager regime". This provision is the 2025 Act's re-enactment of the old Section 271FAB of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the substance is carried over almost unchanged.
The fund manager regime itself now sits in Section 212 of the 2025 Act (the successor to the well-known Section 9A of the 1961 Act). That regime is a "safe harbour": it says that where an eligible offshore fund is managed from India by an eligible fund manager, the mere presence of that manager does not create a taxable "business connection" or make the fund a tax resident of India. In exchange for this valuable protection, the fund must comply with reporting obligations — chiefly, filing an annual statement (historically in Form 3CEK) with the Assessing Officer confirming that the qualifying conditions are met. Section 456 is the enforcement teeth behind that filing duty.
Who it applies to
- Eligible investment funds — typically offshore/foreign funds that engage an India-based fund manager and rely on the Section 212 (old 9A) safe harbour to avoid an Indian taxable presence.
- It does not apply to ordinary domestic mutual funds, retail investors, salaried taxpayers or businesses. This is a niche cross-border provision aimed at the asset-management industry, especially funds operating through or relocating to an International Financial Services Centre (IFSC) such as GIFT City.
The default that triggers the penalty
The regime requires the fund to file a statement (with prescribed information/documents) within 90 days from the end of the financial year, demonstrating fulfilment of the conditions of the regime. A penalty under Section 456 becomes leviable when the fund:
- fails to furnish the required statement at all; or
- fails to furnish the required information or document along with it; or
- files it beyond the prescribed time limit.
Amount of penalty
The penalty is a flat ₹5,00,000 (five lakh rupees). Unlike some penalties, it is not a per-day or percentage-of-value amount — it is a single fixed sum for the failure. This mirrors the ₹5,00,000 figure that applied under Section 271FAB of the 1961 Act.
How it interacts with related sections
- Section 212 (old Section 9A) — creates the obligation. Section 456 only bites because Section 212 requires the statement to be filed.
- Reasonable-cause defence — the 2025 Act continues the old Section 273B relief (now housed in the general "no penalty for reasonable cause" provision of the 2025 Act, Section 472). If the fund proves there was a genuine, reasonable cause for the failure, the penalty need not be imposed.
- Neighbouring penalty sections — Section 456 sits inside the penalties chapter alongside sections dealing with financial-transaction statements (SFT), inaccurate reporting and transfer-pricing documentation, but each targets a different default. Section 456 is specific to the eligible-investment-fund statement.
Practical implications
- Compliance calendar matters. The 90-day window is short. Fund administrators should diarise the deadline immediately after the financial year closes.
- Fixed cost of non-compliance. Because ₹5,00,000 is flat, even a short delay attracts the full amount — but it does not keep growing, unlike daily penalties.
- Documentation discipline. The statement certifies fulfilment of the regime's conditions; incomplete or missing supporting documents can themselves be a failure.
- Defence is available but must be proved. The onus is on the fund to establish reasonable cause; a bare assertion is unlikely to succeed.
- Verify current forms and thresholds. Form numbers and procedural detail are prescribed by rules that can change; confirm the applicable form and due date for the relevant tax year before filing.
💡 Example
Worked example 1 — late filing. Meridian Global Opportunities Fund, an offshore fund managed from GIFT City, relies on the Section 212 safe harbour. Its financial year ends 31 March 2027, so its statement is due by roughly 29 June 2027 (within 90 days). Owing to a change of administrator, it files only on 10 August 2027. Even though the delay is about six weeks and the information is otherwise complete, the fund is exposed to the full flat penalty of ₹5,00,000 under Section 456 — the amount does not scale with the length of delay.
Worked example 2 — missing document. Cedar Asia Fund files its statement on time but omits the supporting document evidencing that resident participation stayed within the 5% corpus limit. Because a required document was not furnished, the failure can still attract the ₹5,00,000 penalty. If, however, the fund can show the omission arose from a genuine, documented reason (say, a portal outage on the deadline day with proof), it may invoke the reasonable-cause defence to avoid the penalty.
A relatable story. Think of Section 456 like the annual "fitness certificate" a driver must submit to keep a special toll-free pass. The pass (the tax safe harbour) is extremely valuable, but the authority insists on one yearly form proving you still qualify. Miss the form or leave a box blank, and you don't lose the pass automatically — but you cop a flat ₹5,00,000 fine. Show a genuine reason for missing it, and the officer may waive the fine. The lesson for fund managers: the filing is cheap, the penalty is not.
| Aspect | Section 456, Income-tax Act, 2025 | Section 271FAB, Income-tax Act, 1961 (predecessor) |
|---|
| Default covered | Failure by an eligible investment fund to furnish statement / information / document | Same |
| Underlying obligation | Section 212 (fund manager regime) | Section 9A |
| Statement / form | Prescribed statement (historically Form 3CEK) — verify current form | Form 3CEK |
| Time limit to file | Within 90 days from end of the financial year | Within 90 days from end of the financial year |
| Penalty amount | Flat ₹5,00,000 | Flat ₹5,00,000 |
| Reasonable-cause relief | Yes (Section 472 of 2025 Act) | Yes (Section 273B) |
| Who it targets | Offshore/eligible investment funds using the safe harbour (esp. IFSC/GIFT City) | Same |
Related sections
Section 212 — Fund manager regime for eligible investment funds (old Section 9A) Section 472 — No penalty where reasonable cause is proved (old Section 273B) Section 454 — Penalty for failure to furnish statement of financial transactions Section 455 — Penalty for furnishing inaccurate information in SFT/reportable account Section 457 — Penalty for failure to furnish transfer-pricing information/documents Section 271FAB (Act of 1961) — Predecessor penalty for eligible investment funds
Frequently asked questions
What is the penalty under Section 456 of the Income-tax Act, 2025?
It is a flat penalty of ₹5,00,000 on an eligible investment fund that fails to furnish the required statement, information or document within the prescribed time. The amount is fixed and does not increase with the length of delay.
Who has to comply with Section 456?
Only eligible investment funds that use the fund manager safe harbour under Section 212 (the successor to Section 9A). Ordinary domestic mutual funds, individual investors and regular businesses are not covered.
What is the filing deadline that triggers Section 456?
The fund must file its statement within 90 days from the end of the relevant financial year. Missing that deadline, or filing an incomplete statement, can attract the penalty.
Which form is used for this statement?
Under the 1961 Act the statement was Form 3CEK, and the 2025 Act carries forward the same requirement. You should verify the exact prescribed form for the applicable tax year, as forms are set by rules that can be updated.
Is there any way to avoid the penalty if the filing is late?
Yes. The 2025 Act continues the reasonable-cause defence (Section 472, formerly Section 273B). If the fund proves there was a genuine reasonable cause for the failure, the penalty need not be imposed, but the burden of proof is on the fund.
Which section of the old Income-tax Act, 1961 does Section 456 correspond to?
Section 456 of the 2025 Act corresponds to Section 271FAB of the 1961 Act. Both impose the same ₹5,00,000 penalty for the same default by an eligible investment fund.
Does a short delay attract a smaller penalty?
No. Because the ₹5,00,000 is a flat amount rather than a daily or percentage charge, even a short delay can attract the full penalty. That said, it does not keep growing over time, unlike per-day penalties.
C
CA Rajat Agrawal
Chartered Accountant, EaseValue · Reviewed 05 Jul 2026
This explainer is prepared and reviewed by EaseValue's tax team, based on the text of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (as amended by the Finance Act, 2026).
Disclaimer: This page explains the law in general terms for education and is not professional advice. The Income-tax Act, 2025 takes effect from 1 April 2026; provisions, thresholds and interpretations may change. Please confirm your specific position with our team before acting.
💬 Discussion & questions
0 comments · Ask anything about this — a Chartered Accountant or the community will reply.
Have a doubt about this (Section 456)? Ask here 👇
Free · takes 20 seconds · our CA answers. No account needed.
No comments yet — be the first to ask. 👆