Section 461 · Penalties
Section 461 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 — Penalty for Failure to Furnish TDS/TCS Statements
By CA Rajat Agrawal
Updated 05 Jul 2026
Chapter XXI
📜 What the law says — Section 461, Income-tax Act 2025
461. (1) Where a person, who is required to deliver or causes to be delivered a
statement prescribed in section 397(3)(b),—
(a) fails to do so within the time prescribed in the said section; or
(b) furnishes incorrect information in the said statement,
the Assessing Officer may impose on such person, a penalty of a sum which shall
not be less than ` 10000 but which may extend to ` 100000.
(2) No penalty shall be levied under sub-section (1)(a) for delay in filing or non-filing
of statement referred therein, if the person proves that—
(a) tax deducted or collected along with the fee and interest, if any, was paid
to the credit of the Central Government; and
(b) the said statement was also delivered or cause to be delivered before the
expiry of one month from the time prescribed in section 397(3)(b).
Penalty for failure to furnish information or furnishing inaccurate information
under section 397(3)(d).
In plain language
What Section 461 is about
Section 461 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 is the penalty provision for a deductor or collector who fails to file the periodic TDS/TCS statement (return) on time, or who files it with incorrect information. It is the re-numbered successor to the well-known Section 271H of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The statement being referred to is the one prescribed under Section 397(3)(b) of the 2025 Act — that is, the quarterly TDS statement (in the old language, Forms 24Q, 26Q, 27Q) and the quarterly TCS statement (Form 27EQ).
In plain words: if you deduct TDS from salaries, contractor payments, rent, interest, professional fees etc., or if you collect TCS, you must not only deposit that money with the Government, you must also report it every quarter. Section 461 is the stick that applies when you miss that reporting duty or report it wrongly.
Who it applies to
- Every TDS deductor — companies, firms, LLPs, proprietors under audit, and any person required to deduct tax at source.
- Every TCS collector — sellers of specified goods, businesses collecting tax at source on sale of scrap, motor vehicles, remittances, etc.
- It does not apply to ordinary salaried taxpayers filing their own ITR — that is a different provision. Section 461 targets the person responsible for filing deduction/collection statements.
The penalty amount
- The Assessing Officer may impose a penalty of not less than ₹10,000 and up to ₹1,00,000.
- The penalty is discretionary, not automatic — the officer weighs the facts. This is different from the daily late-filing fee (see below), which is automatic.
- It applies to two defaults: (a) failure to file the statement within the prescribed time, and (b) furnishing incorrect information (wrong PAN, wrong challan details, wrong amounts) in the statement.
The important relief — Section 461(2)
No penalty is levied for late/non-filing if the deductor/collector proves that:
- The tax deducted or collected was paid to the credit of the Central Government, along with any late-filing fee and interest; and
- The statement was actually delivered within the grace window allowed by the section, measured from the due date in Section 397(3)(b).
In effect, if you have paid the Government its money (with fee and interest) and you file the statement within the cure period, the ₹10,000–₹1,00,000 penalty simply does not apply. Note: sources on the exact length of this grace window differ — several describe it as one month under the 2025 Act, while the legacy Section 271H allowed one year. Because this figure directly affects money, confirm the current window from the bare Act/Rules or a professional before relying on it. Importantly, this relief in sub-section (2) covers the late-filing limb only; the "incorrect information" limb is not automatically forgiven.
How it interacts with related sections
- Section 427 (late-filing fee, old 234E): A mandatory fee of ₹200 per day of delay, capped at the total TDS/TCS amount. This runs in addition to Section 461 — the fee is automatic; the 461 penalty is separate and discretionary.
- Section 397(3)(b): The section that actually requires the statement to be filed — the trigger for 461.
- Interest for late deposit and the fee must be cleared to claim the 461(2) relief.
Practical implications
- File your quarterly statements on time — the daily fee under Section 427 accrues relentlessly, and once past the cure window the discretionary penalty of up to ₹1,00,000 opens up.
- Always deposit the tax first — the penalty relief hinges on the Government having received its money plus fee and interest.
- Verify PANs and challan details before filing; the "incorrect information" limb can attract penalty even if you filed on time.
💡 Example
Worked example 1 — filed within the cure window. Sharma Traders deducted ₹80,000 of TDS in Q1. It missed the statement due date by 20 days but had already deposited the ₹80,000, then paid the Section 427 fee of ₹200 × 20 = ₹4,000 plus interest, and filed the statement on day 20. Because the tax, fee and interest were paid and the statement went in within the grace period, no Section 461 penalty applies — Sharma Traders pays only the ₹4,000 fee (and interest).
Worked example 2 — well beyond the cure window. Verma Pvt Ltd deducted ₹50,000 TDS but did not file the statement at all for many months. The Section 427 fee accrues at ₹200/day but is capped at the TDS amount, so it stops at ₹50,000. On top of that, because the default is prolonged and the 461(2) relief no longer applies, the Assessing Officer levies a Section 461 penalty of ₹40,000 (within the ₹10,000–₹1,00,000 band). Total hit: ₹50,000 fee + ₹40,000 penalty + interest.
Relatable story. Meena runs a small design studio and deducts TDS on her freelancers' payments. One quarter, her accountant was on leave and the return slipped her mind. Panicking, she called her CA, who told her the smart move: deposit any pending tax immediately, pay the ₹200/day fee, and file the statement fast — within the cure window. She did, and the dreaded ₹1 lakh penalty never came into play. Her lesson: it is the reporting deadline, not just the payment, that the law watches.
| Aspect | Section 461 (2025 Act) | Section 271H (1961 Act) |
|---|
| Nature | Penalty for failure to furnish / incorrect TDS-TCS statement | Same |
| Statement reference | Section 397(3)(b) | Sections 200(3) / 206C(3) |
| Who imposes | Assessing Officer (discretionary) | Assessing Officer (discretionary) |
| Penalty amount | ₹10,000 to ₹1,00,000 | ₹10,000 to ₹1,00,000 |
| Defaults covered | Late/non-filing AND incorrect information | Late/non-filing AND incorrect information |
| Relief window (tax + fee + interest paid, statement filed) | Reported as ~1 month (verify with bare Act) | Within 1 year of due date |
| Related late-filing fee | Section 427 — ₹200/day, capped at TDS/TCS amount | Section 234E — ₹200/day, capped |
Related sections
Section 397 — Duty to furnish TDS/TCS statements Section 427 — Fee for late filing of TDS/TCS statements (old 234E) Section 454 — Penalty for failure to furnish statement of financial transaction Section 271H (1961 Act) — Legacy equivalent penalty provision Section 234E (1961 Act) — Legacy ₹200/day late-filing fee Section 273B equivalent — No penalty where reasonable cause is shown
Frequently asked questions
Is the Section 461 penalty automatic if I file my TDS return late?
No. The penalty of ₹10,000 to ₹1,00,000 is discretionary and imposed by the Assessing Officer. However, the separate daily late-filing fee under Section 427 (₹200 per day) is automatic and applies regardless.
How can I avoid the Section 461 penalty for a late statement?
Deposit the deducted/collected tax to the Government along with the late-filing fee and interest, and file the statement within the grace window allowed by Section 461(2). If those conditions are met, no penalty is levied for the delay.
What is the difference between Section 427 and Section 461?
Section 427 (old 234E) is a mandatory fee of ₹200 per day of delay, capped at the TDS/TCS amount. Section 461 (old 271H) is a discretionary penalty of ₹10,000 to ₹1,00,000. Both can apply to the same default.
Does Section 461 apply to ordinary salaried taxpayers?
No. It targets deductors and collectors responsible for filing TDS/TCS statements, not individuals filing their personal income-tax returns.
Can I be penalised even if I filed the statement on time?
Yes. Section 461 also covers furnishing incorrect information — such as wrong PANs, challan details or amounts — so accuracy matters as much as timeliness. The 461(2) relief only covers the late-filing limb.
What is the maximum penalty under Section 461?
The maximum is ₹1,00,000, with a minimum of ₹10,000, decided by the Assessing Officer based on the facts of the case.
What is Section 461 the equivalent of in the old Act?
It is the successor to Section 271H of the Income-tax Act, 1961, carrying forward the same ₹10,000–₹1,00,000 penalty structure for TDS/TCS statement defaults.
C
CA Rajat Agrawal
Chartered Accountant, EaseValue · Reviewed 05 Jul 2026
This explainer is prepared and reviewed by EaseValue's tax team, based on the text of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (as amended by the Finance Act, 2026).
Disclaimer: This page explains the law in general terms for education and is not professional advice. The Income-tax Act, 2025 takes effect from 1 April 2026; provisions, thresholds and interpretations may change. Please confirm your specific position with our team before acting.
💬 Discussion & questions
0 comments · Ask anything about this — a Chartered Accountant or the community will reply.
Have a doubt about this (Section 461)? Ask here 👇
Free · takes 20 seconds · our CA answers. No account needed.
No comments yet — be the first to ask. 👆