Section 469 · Penalties
Section 469 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 — Power to Reduce or Waive Penalty in Certain Cases
By CA Rajat Agrawal
Updated 05 Jul 2026
Chapter XXI
📜 What the law says — Section 469, Income-tax Act 2025
469. (1) Irrespective of anything contained in this Act, the Principal Commissioner
or Commissioner may, whether on his own motion or otherwise, at his dis-
cretion reduce or waive the penalty imposed or imposable under section 439 if he
is satisfied that such person,––
(a) before the Assessing Officer detected any concealment of particulars of
income or of the inaccuracy of particulars furnished in respect of such
income, has made a full and true disclosure of such particulars voluntarily
and in good faith; and
(b) has cooperated in any enquiry relating to the assessment of his income
and has paid or made satisfactory arrangements to pay any tax or interest
payable in consequence of an order passed under this Act in respect of
the relevant tax year.
(2) For the purposes of sub-section (1), a person shall be deemed to have made
full and true disclosure of his income or of the particulars relating thereto if the
difference between the assessed and returned income does not attract penalties
under section 439.
(3) Irrespective of anything contained in sub-section (1) or (2), if in a case falling
under section 439, the amount of income in respect of which the penalty is imposed
or imposable for the relevant tax year or where such disclosure relates to more than
14. Substituted for “section 262” by the Finance Act, 2026, w.e.f. 1-4-2026.
one tax year, and aggregate amount of such income or disclosure thereof for such
years exceeds ` 500000, the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner shall obtain
prior approval from the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or
Principal Director General or Director General, as the case may be, before waiving
or reducing the penalty by order referred to in sub-section (1).
(4) Where an order has been made under sub-section (1) in favour of any person,
whether such order relates to one or more tax years, he shall not be entitled to
any relief under this section in relation to any other tax year at any time after the
making of such order.
(5) The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner may, upon an application from
the assessee, and after recording his reasons for doing so, reduce or waive the
amount of penalty or penalties (whether they relate to one or more tax years)
payable by the assessee or stay or compound any proceeding for the recovery of
any such amount, if––
(a) doing otherwise would cause genuine hardship to the as
In plain language
What Section 469 actually does
Section 469 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 gives senior income-tax authorities a discretionary power to reduce, waive or hold in abeyance a penalty that has been (or could be) imposed on a taxpayer. It is the successor to the well-known Section 273A of the old Income-tax Act, 1961, and the language and conditions have been carried over almost word-for-word. The provision is effective from 1 April 2026.
The power is exercised by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Income-tax — not by the Assessing Officer who levied the penalty. It applies specifically to penalties for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 439 of the 2025 Act (the equivalent of the old Section 271(1)(c) / under-reporting provisions).
The two separate routes to relief
- Route 1 — Voluntary disclosure (sub-sections 1 to 4): Relief for a taxpayer who owns up before getting caught. The Commissioner may reduce or waive the penalty if the taxpayer has (a) made a full and true disclosure of income particulars voluntarily and in good faith before detection by the Assessing Officer, (b) cooperated in any inquiry relating to the assessment, and (c) paid or made satisfactory arrangements to pay the tax and interest due.
- Route 2 — Genuine hardship (sub-section 5): Relief on application by the taxpayer where paying the penalty would cause genuine hardship, provided the taxpayer cooperated in the assessment or recovery. Under this route the Commissioner can also stay or compound recovery proceedings, not just waive the penalty.
Who it applies to
- Any assessee — individual, HUF, firm, company, LLP or other person — facing a penalty under Section 439.
- Route 1 rewards taxpayers who come clean before the department finds the concealment. If the department has already detected it, the "voluntary and good faith" test fails.
- Route 2 is a compassionate/equitable relief aimed at taxpayers in real financial distress, judged case by case.
Key conditions, limits and approvals
- Deemed full disclosure: A person is treated as having made a full and true disclosure where the difference between the assessed income and the returned income is such that it does not attract a penalty under Section 439.
- ₹5 lakh multi-year rule: Where the relief relates to income of more than one tax year and the concealed/relevant income aggregates to more than ₹5,00,000, the Commissioner must obtain prior approval of the Principal Chief Commissioner / Chief Commissioner / Principal Director General / Director General.
- Once-in-a-lifetime bar (sub-section 4): Once relief has been granted to a person under the voluntary-disclosure route, that person is not entitled to relief again under this section for any other tax year. This is a genuine one-time benefit.
- ₹1 lakh rule for hardship route: If the aggregate penalty to be reduced or waived under sub-section (5) exceeds ₹1,00,000, prior approval of the higher authority is required.
- Time limit (sub-section 7): An order on a hardship application must be passed within twelve months from the end of the month in which the application was received.
- Right to be heard (sub-section 8): No application can be rejected without giving the assessee an opportunity of being heard.
- Finality (sub-section 9): Every order under this section is final and cannot be questioned in any court or before any authority. There is no appeal against a Section 469 order.
How it interacts with related sections
- Section 439 is the parent penalty provision — Section 469 only softens penalties levied under it.
- It sits alongside immunity provisions (the 2025 Act's equivalent of the old Section 270AA immunity for under-reporting on quick payment) — but Section 469 is a discretionary Commissioner power, not an automatic entitlement.
- The hardship + stay/compounding power under sub-section (5) overlaps with recovery provisions, letting the Commissioner ease collection pressure.
Practical implications for taxpayers
- Because relief is discretionary and final/non-appealable, a well-drafted application citing the exact conditions is critical.
- Coming forward before detection is far stronger than pleading hardship afterwards — timing is everything.
- Keep the once-in-a-lifetime bar in mind: don't "spend" your voluntary-disclosure relief on a small penalty if a bigger issue may surface later.
💡 Example
Example 1 — Voluntary disclosure (Route 1). Mr. Sharma realises he forgot to report ₹4,00,000 of interest and capital gains across FY 2026-27, before the Assessing Officer notices anything. He files a revised/updated position, discloses fully, cooperates and pays the tax of, say, ₹1,20,000 plus interest. A penalty under Section 439 of, say, ₹1,20,000 could otherwise apply. Because his disclosure was voluntary, in good faith and before detection, the Commissioner can waive the entire ₹1,20,000 penalty under Section 469(1). Since the income is under ₹5,00,000 and relates to a single year, no higher approval is needed.
Example 2 — Genuine hardship (Route 2). M/s Verma Traders is hit with a penalty of ₹1,50,000, but the business has suffered heavy losses and paying it would push it into insolvency. The firm applies under Section 469(5) showing genuine hardship and proving it cooperated in the assessment. Because the amount exceeds ₹1,00,000, the Commissioner must take prior approval of the higher authority. The Commissioner may then waive part of it — say reduce ₹1,50,000 to ₹40,000 — and stay recovery. The order must come within 12 months of the application.
A relatable story. Priya, a salaried professional, missed reporting freelance income of ₹2,00,000. Anxious, she disclosed it herself and paid the tax before any notice arrived. Her CA filed a clean Section 469(1) request. The Commissioner, satisfied she acted in good faith, waived the penalty entirely — but reminded her this was a one-time benefit under sub-section (4), so she now files with extra care every year.
| Aspect | Route 1 — Voluntary Disclosure (s.469(1)-(4)) | Route 2 — Genuine Hardship (s.469(5)-(8)) |
|---|
| Trigger | Full, true, voluntary disclosure before detection | Application showing genuine hardship + cooperation |
| Who decides | Principal Commissioner / Commissioner | Principal Commissioner / Commissioner |
| Penalty covered | Penalty under Section 439 | Penalty under Section 439 |
| Extra power | Reduce or waive penalty | Reduce, waive, or stay/compound recovery |
| Prior approval needed | If multi-year income aggregates > ₹5,00,000 | If aggregate penalty waived > ₹1,00,000 |
| One-time bar | Yes — no relief again for any other year | No express once-only bar |
| Time limit for order | Not fixed (suo motu / on facts) | Within 12 months of month-end of application |
| Opportunity of hearing | General fairness | Mandatory before rejection |
| Appeal against order | None — order is final | None — order is final |
Related sections
Section 439 — Penalty for under-reporting or concealment of income Section 273A (Act 1961) — Old equivalent power to waive/reduce penalty Section 470 — Power of Commissioner to grant immunity from penalty Section 471 — Power to reduce or waive interest in certain cases Section 441 — Penalty for failure to furnish return / comply with notices Section 268 — Updated return and voluntary disclosure of income
Frequently asked questions
Can I appeal if the Commissioner rejects my Section 469 waiver request?
No. Sub-section (9) makes every order under Section 469 final and it cannot be questioned by any court or authority. Your only remedy would be a writ petition in the High Court on limited grounds like arbitrariness or denial of hearing.
Is penalty waiver under Section 469 automatic if I disclose voluntarily?
No. It is entirely discretionary. Even if you meet the conditions, the Commissioner may reduce rather than fully waive, or decline. Meeting the voluntary, good-faith, pre-detection and cooperation conditions only makes you eligible.
How many times can I get relief under Section 469?
Under the voluntary-disclosure route (sub-section 4), only once in a lifetime. Once relief is granted for one year, you cannot claim it again for any other tax year under that route.
What is the difference between Section 469 and the old Section 273A?
Section 469 of the 2025 Act is the direct successor to Section 273A of the 1961 Act. The conditions — pre-detection disclosure, cooperation, payment, the ₹5 lakh and ₹1 lakh approval thresholds and the 12-month limit — are carried over almost verbatim.
When must the Commissioner decide my hardship application?
Within twelve months from the end of the month in which your application under sub-section (5) is received. Your application cannot be rejected without first giving you an opportunity of being heard.
Which penalties can be waived under Section 469?
Penalties imposed or imposable under Section 439 — that is, penalties relating to concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.
Do I need higher approval for the waiver?
Yes, in two situations: under the voluntary route if multi-year concealed income exceeds ₹5,00,000, and under the hardship route if the aggregate penalty waived exceeds ₹1,00,000. In both cases prior approval of a Chief Commissioner / Director General level authority is required.
C
CA Rajat Agrawal
Chartered Accountant, EaseValue · Reviewed 05 Jul 2026
This explainer is prepared and reviewed by EaseValue's tax team, based on the text of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (as amended by the Finance Act, 2026).
Disclaimer: This page explains the law in general terms for education and is not professional advice. The Income-tax Act, 2025 takes effect from 1 April 2026; provisions, thresholds and interpretations may change. Please confirm your specific position with our team before acting.
💬 Discussion & questions
0 comments · Ask anything about this — a Chartered Accountant or the community will reply.
Have a doubt about this (Section 469)? Ask here 👇
Free · takes 20 seconds · our CA answers. No account needed.
No comments yet — be the first to ask. 👆
EaseValue