Section 470 · Penalties
Section 470 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 — Penalty Not to Be Imposed for Reasonable Cause
By CA Rajat Agrawal
Updated 05 Jul 2026
Chapter XXI
📜 What the law says — Section 470, Income-tax Act 2025
470. Irrespective of anything contained in the provisions of section 441 or 442 or
446 15[***] or 448 or 449 or 450 or 451 or 452 or 453 or 454 or 455 or 456 or
457 or 458 or 459 or 460 or 461 or 462 or 463 or 465(1)(c) or 465(1)(d) or 465(2)
or 466 or 467 or 468, no penalty shall be imposed on a person or assessee for any
failure referred to in the said provisions, if he proves that there was reasonable
cause for the said failure.
Procedure.
In plain language
What Section 470 actually says
Section 470 is the taxpayer's shield. It provides that for a specified list of penalty provisions, no penalty shall be imposed on a person or assessee for the failure in question if he proves that there was a reasonable cause for that failure. It opens with a non-obstante clause — "irrespective of anything contained in" the listed penalty sections — meaning it overrides those penalty sections when reasonable cause is established.
Section 470 is the Income-tax Act, 2025 successor to the well-known Section 273B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The wording, the policy and decades of case law built around "reasonable cause" carry over in substance. It is effective from 1 April 2026 along with the rest of the 2025 Act.
Which penalties are covered
Section 470 does NOT waive every penalty. It applies only to the failures under these listed provisions: sections 441, 442, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 465(1)(c), 465(1)(d), 465(2), 466, 467 and 468. These broadly cover:
- Failure to keep, maintain or retain books/records and audit-related defaults.
- Failure to get accounts audited or furnish audit reports / prescribed reports.
- Failure to deduct or collect tax (TDS/TCS) defaults and to comply with various procedural obligations.
- Failure to furnish statements, information, returns or documents called for by the department.
- Failure to comply with notices and to answer questions, sign statements or produce records.
What is NOT covered
Concealment / misreporting penalties are outside its reach. Penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income (the successor to old Section 270A) is deliberately left out, just as Section 271(1)(c) was excluded under the 1961 regime. The logic is simple: reasonable cause protects innocent, non-deliberate procedural lapses, not concealment of income. So you cannot invoke Section 470 to escape a penalty for hiding income.
Who it applies to
- Every category of taxpayer — individuals, HUFs, firms, LLPs, companies, trusts and deductors/collectors — can rely on it.
- It is available to the person on whom the penalty is proposed, and the burden of proof rests squarely on that person.
What counts as "reasonable cause"
The Act does not define it, but courts have consistently read it as a cause that would prevent a reasonable person of ordinary prudence, acting under normal circumstances and without negligence, from complying. Genuine, bona fide reasons beyond the taxpayer's control qualify; carelessness, wilful default or a "couldn't be bothered" attitude do not. Commonly accepted causes include:
- Serious illness, hospitalisation or death of the taxpayer or the person responsible for compliance.
- Bona fide reliance on professional advice from a Chartered Accountant / tax counsel.
- Loss of records by fire, flood, theft or seizure by authorities.
- Genuine confusion on a debatable point of law or a bona fide belief later found wrong.
- Technical/portal failures, natural calamities or circumstances beyond control.
How it interacts with related sections
- Section 471 (opportunity of hearing): a penalty cannot be levied without a show-cause notice and a reasonable opportunity of being heard. Section 470 is the substantive defence you raise during that hearing.
- Section 472 (time limit): sets the time frame for penalty orders and expressly recognises orders that drop the proceedings — which is what happens when reasonable cause is accepted.
- Under-reporting/misreporting penalty: excluded from Section 470's protection.
Practical implications
- It is a defence, not an automatic exemption. The taxpayer must actively plead and prove reasonable cause with evidence — medical papers, correspondence, FIR/insurance for loss of records, professional opinions, etc.
- Word "may" vs "shall": once reasonable cause is proved, the penalty shall not be imposed — it is mandatory relief, not discretionary. This is a strong protection.
- Document everything at the time. Contemporaneous evidence is far more persuasive than an after-the-fact explanation.
💡 Example
Worked example 1 — Late audit report due to hospitalisation. Mr. Sharma, a partner running a business liable to tax audit, is hospitalised for two months and misses filing his audit report on time. A penalty is proposed under the audit-default provision (say ₹1,50,000 or 0.5% of turnover, whichever is lower). He produces hospital discharge summaries and doctor's certificates. Because the delay was caused by genuine serious illness beyond his control, the Assessing Officer accepts reasonable cause under Section 470 and drops the penalty entirely — the levy falls to ₹0.
Worked example 2 — Loss of records by fire. A firm cannot produce its books during assessment because a fire destroyed them; a penalty of ₹25,000 is proposed for failure to maintain/produce records. The firm files the fire-brigade report, the FIR and the insurance claim. Section 470 relief applies and the ₹25,000 penalty is waived. Contrast this with a firm that simply "forgot" to keep books — there, no reasonable cause exists and the ₹25,000 stands.
A relatable story. Priya, a first-time small-business owner, relied entirely on her Chartered Accountant to file a required statement. The CA's office had a data crash and missed the deadline, triggering a ₹10,000 penalty notice. Frightened, Priya nearly paid it. Her new advisor instead invoked Section 470, attaching the CA's written confirmation of the technical failure and proof of the bona fide reliance. The officer accepted the reasonable cause and cancelled the penalty. Priya learned the key lesson: reasonable cause is a right you must claim with evidence, not something granted automatically.
| Aspect | Section 470, Income-tax Act 2025 | Section 273B, Income-tax Act 1961 (old) |
|---|
| Purpose | Bars penalty if reasonable cause is proved | Same — bars penalty for reasonable cause |
| Covered penalties | Ss. 441, 442, 446–463, 465(1)(c), 465(1)(d), 465(2), 466, 467, 468 | Specified list incl. 271A, 271B, 271C, 271D, 272A etc. |
| Concealment / under-reporting | NOT covered | NOT covered (271(1)(c)/270A excluded) |
| Burden of proof | On the taxpayer | On the taxpayer |
| Effect once proved | Penalty "shall not" be imposed (mandatory relief) | Penalty "shall not" be imposed |
| Right to be heard | Via Section 471 (show-cause) | Via Section 274 |
| Effective from | 1 April 2026 | Applied till transition to 2025 Act |
Related sections
Section 471 — Opportunity of being heard before penalty Section 472 — Time limit for passing penalty orders Section 439 — Penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income Section 446 — Penalty for failure to get accounts audited Section 465 — Penalty for failure to deduct or collect tax Section 468 — Penalty for failure to furnish statements/information
Frequently asked questions
Does Section 470 automatically cancel my penalty?
No. It is a defence you must raise and prove. You have to satisfy the Assessing Officer with evidence that a genuine reasonable cause existed; only then is the penalty barred.
Can I use Section 470 to escape a penalty for hiding income?
No. Penalties for under-reporting or misreporting of income are deliberately kept outside Section 470. It protects only innocent, non-deliberate procedural failures, not concealment.
Is Section 470 the same as the old Section 273B?
Yes, in substance. Section 470 of the Income-tax Act 2025 is the successor to Section 273B of the 1961 Act, carrying forward the same 'reasonable cause' protection and the case law built around it.
What kind of evidence proves reasonable cause?
Contemporaneous documents work best — medical/hospital records, death certificates, fire-brigade or police reports, insurance claims, written professional advice, or proof of portal/technical failure relevant to the specific default.
Is illness of my accountant a reasonable cause?
It can be, if the compliance genuinely depended on that person and you acted in good faith. Courts have accepted illness, death, or bona fide reliance on a professional as reasonable cause, but each case is decided on its facts.
Once I prove reasonable cause, can the officer still levy a reduced penalty?
No. The section uses 'shall not be imposed', so once reasonable cause is genuinely established the penalty must be dropped entirely — it is not a discretion to merely reduce it.
Which penalties does Section 470 cover?
It covers the failures listed in sections 441, 442, 446 to 463, 465(1)(c), 465(1)(d), 465(2), 466, 467 and 468 — largely record-keeping, audit, TDS/TCS and information-furnishing defaults.
C
CA Rajat Agrawal
Chartered Accountant, EaseValue · Reviewed 05 Jul 2026
This explainer is prepared and reviewed by EaseValue's tax team, based on the text of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (as amended by the Finance Act, 2026).
Disclaimer: This page explains the law in general terms for education and is not professional advice. The Income-tax Act, 2025 takes effect from 1 April 2026; provisions, thresholds and interpretations may change. Please confirm your specific position with our team before acting.
💬 Discussion & questions
0 comments · Ask anything about this — a Chartered Accountant or the community will reply.
Have a doubt about this (Section 470)? Ask here 👇
Free · takes 20 seconds · our CA answers. No account needed.
No comments yet — be the first to ask. 👆
EaseValue