HomeIncome Tax Act 2025 Business & Profession Income under the Income-tax Act, 2025 Section 51 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 — Amortis...
Section 51 · Computation of total income

Section 51 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 — Amortisation of Expenditure for Prospecting Certain Minerals

By CA Rajat Agrawal Updated 04 Jul 2026 Chapter IV
📜 What the law says — Section 51, Income-tax Act 2025
51. (1) An assessee, being an Indian company or a person (other than a company) who is resident in India, who is engaged in any operations relating to pros- pecting for, or extraction or production of, any mineral, shall be allowed a deduc- tion of an amount equal to one-tenth of the amount of expenditure referred to in sub-section (2), in each of the relevant tax years. (2) The expenditure referred to in sub-section (1) is the expenditure incurred by the assessee at any time during the year of commercial production and any one or more of the four tax years immediately preceding that year, wholly and exclusively on any operations relating to prospecting for any mineral or group of associated minerals specified in Part A or Part B, respectively, of the Schedule XII or on the development of a mine or other natural deposit of any such mineral or group of associated minerals. (3) The expenditure under sub-section (2) shall be reduced by such expenditure which is met directly or indirectly by any other person or authority and any sale, salvage, compensation or insurance moneys realised by the assessee in respect of any property or rights brought into existence as a result of the expenditure. (4) The following expenditure shall be excluded from the expenditure referred to in sub-section (2):— (a) any expenditure on the acquisition of the site of the source of any mineral or group of associated minerals referred to in the said sub-section or of any rights in or over such site; or (b) any expenditure on the acquisition of the deposits of such mineral or group of associated minerals or of any rights in or over such deposits; or (c) any expenditure of a capital nature in respect of any building, machinery, plant or furniture for which allowance by way of depreciation is admis- sible under section 33. (5) The deduction to be allowed under sub-section (1) for any relevant tax year shall be— (a) an amount equal to one-tenth of the expenditure specified in sub-section (2) as reduced by the expenditure mentioned in sub-sections (3) and (4) (such one-tenth being herein referred to as the instalment); or (b) such amount as is sufficient to reduce to nil the income (as computed before making the deduction under this section) of that tax year arising from the commercial exploitation [whether or not such commercial exploitation is

In plain language

What Section 51 is about

Section 51 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (effective 1 April 2026, replacing the old Section 35E of the Income-tax Act, 1961) allows a business in the mining sector to spread out (amortise) the money it spent searching for minerals and developing a mine. Instead of writing off the whole cost in one year, the law lets you claim a deduction of one-tenth of the qualifying expenditure every year for ten years. This is because prospecting and mine-development happen years before any actual income arrives, so a one-shot deduction would be wasted (there is no profit yet to set it against). Amortisation matches the cost to the income that follows.

Who can claim it

  • An Indian company, or
  • A resident person (other than a company) — such as a resident individual, HUF, firm or LLP.

Foreign companies and non-residents are not eligible. The taxpayer must be engaged in operations relating to prospecting for, or extraction or production of, a specified mineral or group of associated minerals (the minerals listed in the schedule to the Act, carried forward from the Seventh Schedule of the 1961 law).

What expenditure qualifies

  • Money spent wholly and exclusively on operations relating to prospecting for the mineral, or on the development of a mine or other natural deposit.
  • Crucially, the law includes even infructuous or abortive operations — if your exploration proved a dead end and found nothing, that cost still qualifies. This is a taxpayer-friendly feature.
  • The expenditure must have been incurred in the year of commercial production or any one or more of the four years immediately preceding it. Older spends (beyond 4 years back) fall outside the window.

What is excluded

  • Cost of acquiring the site of the mine or the mineral deposit itself (or rights over it).
  • Capital expenditure on any building, machinery, plant or furniture for which depreciation is separately allowable — you claim depreciation on those, not amortisation.
  • Any amount already met by another person or authority, or claimed as a deduction under any other provision — no double deduction.

How the deduction is calculated

For each of the ten "relevant" tax years starting with the year of commercial production, the deduction is the lower of:

  • (a) one-tenth of the qualifying (adjusted) expenditure; or
  • (b) the amount that reduces to nil the income of that year from the commercial exploitation of that mine/mineral.

In other words the deduction cannot create or increase a loss against that mining income for the year — it is capped at the income of that specific mining activity.

Carry-forward of unabsorbed instalment

If in any year the full one-tenth cannot be allowed because mining income is too low, the shortfall is carried forward and added to the next year's instalment. This can continue year after year, but no instalment can be carried beyond the tenth year from the year commercial production began. Anything still unabsorbed after year ten lapses.

Audit requirement

Where the taxpayer is not a company (nor, historically, a co-operative society), the accounts of that business for the relevant year must be audited by a Chartered Accountant and the audit report furnished with the return. Under the 1961 regime this was Form 3AE under rule 6AB; the 2025 rules carry forward an equivalent report. Companies are already subject to statutory audit, so a separate report is not additionally prescribed for them.

Amalgamation and demerger

If the mining undertaking is transferred in a scheme of amalgamation or demerger to another Indian company, the successor company steps into the shoes of the predecessor and continues the remaining instalments "as if the amalgamation or demerger had not taken place." The transferring company gets no deduction in the year of transfer for the transferred instalments — continuity, not duplication.

Practical implications

  • Keep a clean project-wise ledger of prospecting and development spends, tagged by year, so you can identify the four-year window when commercial production begins.
  • Separate depreciable capital assets (plant, buildings) from amortisable exploration spend — mixing them up is a common audit dispute.
  • Because the deduction is capped at that mine's income, early-stage miners with low output often carry forward large chunks — track the ten-year clock carefully.
💡 Example

Worked example 1 — straightforward amortisation. Zinc Explorers Pvt. Ltd. (an Indian company) spends ₹5 crore over FY 2022-23 to FY 2025-26 on prospecting and developing a zinc mine. Commercial production starts in FY 2026-27. All ₹5 crore falls within the year-of-production plus the four preceding years, and none of it is site-acquisition or depreciable plant. Qualifying expenditure = ₹5 crore. The annual instalment = one-tenth = ₹50 lakh per year for ten years (FY 2026-27 to FY 2035-36). If the mine earns ₹2 crore profit in FY 2026-27, the full ₹50 lakh is allowed (it is less than the income), leaving taxable mining income of ₹1.5 crore.

Worked example 2 — the income cap and carry-forward. Same facts, but in the first year FY 2026-27 the mine earns only ₹30 lakh. The deduction is the lower of ₹50 lakh (one-tenth) or ₹30 lakh (income that reduces to nil) = ₹30 lakh allowed. The unabsorbed ₹20 lakh is carried forward and added to next year's ₹50 lakh instalment, so FY 2027-28 starts with a ₹70 lakh claim (again capped at that year's mining income). This roll-forward can continue, but must be fully absorbed by FY 2035-36 (the tenth year); any balance left after that lapses.

A relatable story. Ramesh, a resident businessman in Rajasthan, spent ₹80 lakh over three years drilling and testing for a limestone deposit near Nagaur. Two of the boreholes were duds — completely infructuous. He worried that the "wasted" money was a total loss. His CA explained that Section 51 specifically allows even abortive prospecting costs, so once commercial production began, Ramesh could amortise the full ₹80 lakh at ₹8 lakh a year. Because he is not a company, his CA also had to audit that mining account and file the audit report along with the return to keep the deduction valid.

FeatureSection 51, Income-tax Act 2025 (from FY 2026-27)Old Section 35E, Act 1961
Who is eligibleIndian company or resident person (other than company)Same
Deduction rate1/10th of qualifying expenditure each year1/10th each year
Number of years10 tax years from year of commercial production10 previous years
Expenditure windowYear of commercial production + 4 preceding yearsSame
Deduction cap per yearLower of 1/10th OR income of that mine (cannot go below nil)Same
Abortive/infructuous spendIncluded and allowableIncluded
Excluded costsSite/deposit acquisition; depreciable building, plant, machinery, furnitureSame
Carry-forward limitUp to 10th year from commercial production; then lapsesSame
Audit (non-company)CA audit + report required (Form 3AE equivalent)Form 3AE, rule 6AB
Amalgamation/demergerSuccessor Indian company continues remaining instalmentsSame

Related sections

Section 33 — Depreciation on buildings, plant and machinery Section 44 — Scientific research expenditure deduction Section 45 — Amortisation of preliminary expenses (old 35D) Section 47 — General deductions in computing business income Section 63 — Provisions for amalgamation and demerger continuity Section 26 — Income chargeable under profits and gains of business or profession

Frequently asked questions

What does Section 51 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 actually allow?
It lets an Indian company or resident taxpayer engaged in mining amortise (spread) its prospecting and mine-development expenditure by claiming one-tenth of it as a deduction each year for ten years, starting from the year commercial production begins.
Is Section 51 the same as the old Section 35E?
Yes, in substance. Section 51 of the 2025 Act is the re-enacted successor to Section 35E of the 1961 Act, keeping the same one-tenth-over-ten-years amortisation, the four-year expenditure window, the income cap and the audit rule, with modernised drafting.
Can I claim the deduction if my exploration found nothing?
Yes. The section specifically covers operations that prove to be infructuous or abortive, so genuine prospecting spend still qualifies even if no commercially viable mineral was found, provided commercial production of some qualifying mineral eventually begins.
What expenditure cannot be claimed under Section 51?
You cannot claim the cost of acquiring the mine site or the mineral deposit itself, nor capital spent on buildings, plant, machinery or furniture on which depreciation is allowed. Amounts met by others or already deducted elsewhere are also excluded to prevent double deduction.
What happens if my mine's income is too small to absorb the full one-tenth?
The deduction each year is capped at that mine's income, so the unabsorbed part of the instalment is carried forward and added to the next year's instalment — but it must be fully used within the ten-year window, after which any balance lapses.
Do I need a tax audit to claim Section 51?
If you are not a company, your mining business accounts must be audited by a Chartered Accountant and the audit report (the Form 3AE equivalent) must be furnished with your return. Companies rely on their statutory audit.
What happens to the deduction if the mining business is merged or demerged?
In a qualifying amalgamation or demerger to an Indian company, the successor company continues the remaining instalments exactly as the original taxpayer would have, as if the reorganisation had not happened, so no deduction is lost.
C
CA Rajat Agrawal
Chartered Accountant, EaseValue · Reviewed 04 Jul 2026
This explainer is prepared and reviewed by EaseValue's tax team, based on the text of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (as amended by the Finance Act, 2026).
Disclaimer: This page explains the law in general terms for education and is not professional advice. The Income-tax Act, 2025 takes effect from 1 April 2026; provisions, thresholds and interpretations may change. Please confirm your specific position with our team before acting.

💬 Discussion & questions

0 comments · Ask anything about this — a Chartered Accountant or the community will reply.

Have a doubt about this (Section 51)? Ask here 👇
Free · takes 20 seconds · our CA answers. No account needed.
Your name
Email (optional)
2 + 6 = ?
Posts appear after a quick moderation check. General information, not professional advice.
No comments yet — be the first to ask. 👆

Have a question on this?

Ask our CA how Section 51 applies to you.

💬 Ask our CA Browse the full Act →
💬