$~97Inthehighcourtofdelhiatnewdelhi+W.p.(C) 5874/2025300Plus Innovative Solutions v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
10 Jan 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
$~97Inthehighcourtofdelhiatnewdelhi+W.p.(C) 5874/2025300Plus Innovative Solutions v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
10 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In $~97Inthehighcourtofdelhiatnewdelhi+W.p.(C) 5874/2025300Plus Innovative Solutions v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal under Section 250 of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 6.The petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~97*INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHIATNEWDELHI+W.P.(C) 5874/2025300PLUS INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS.....Petitioner
Through:Mr. Mukesh Chand, Adv.
Versus
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER.....RespondentThrough:Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, Adv.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRUHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAO R D E R%05.05.2025
1.Issue notice.
2.The learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice.
3.The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying thatdirections be issued to the respondent to give effect to the order dated10.01.2024 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [Act] in respect ofAssessment Year 2017-18.
4.For the reasons stated in the petition, the same is allowed.
5.The concerned authorities are directed to pass an appropriate ordergiving effect to the appellate order dated 10.01.2024 in respect of AY2017-18 as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of sixweeks from date.
6.The petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
TEJAS KARIA, J
MAY 5, 2025
‘gsr’Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue