A Member Of The Income-Tax Contingent Employee'sunion)Union v. Union Of India

[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANAT JODHPUR-------------------------------------------------------------- D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10817/2016 PETITIONERS: 1.Income-tax Contingent Employee's Union, Income-Tax Office, Jodhpur (Association of Casual Labours ofIncome-tax, Rajasthan, Jodhpur).Tax Office, Jodhpur (Association of Casual Labours ofIncome-tax, Rajasthan, Jodhpur). 2.Anil Kumar Solanki S/o. Shri Bhanwar Lal, agedabout 31 years, R/o. H.No.8, Baldev Nagar, Mataji KaThan Road, Punjla Mandore, Jodhpur-342001.about 31 years, R/o. H.No.8, Baldev Nagar, Mataji KaThan Road, Punjla Mandore, Jodhpur-342001. (A member of the Income-tax Contingent Employee'sUnion)Union) VERSUS RESPONDENTS: 1.Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry ofFinance, Department of Revenue, Government ofIndia, New Delhi-110001.Finance, Department of Revenue, Government ofIndia, New Delhi-110001. 2.Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Paota, C-Road,Jodhpur-342006.Jodhpur-342006. DATE OF JUDGMENT : 04.11.2016 HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR,J. HON'BLE MR. DEEPAK MAHESHWARI,J. Mr. T.C. Gupta, for the petitioner BY THE COURT : JUDGMENT------------ This writ petition is preferred to question correctness of order dated 12.5.2016 passed by CentralAdministrative Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur inOrignal Application No.290/00325/2015. By the order aforesaid, the Tribunal while accepting the original application directed therespondent- Income Tax Department to revise pay ofmembers of the petitioner-union and also to makepayment of arrears accrued. The instant petition for writ is preferred to have adirection for interest upon the arrears accrued. We do not find any just reason to interfere withthe order, which otherwise takes care of all the rightsclaimed by the petitioner trade-union. [3] The writ petition hence is dismissed. (DEEPAK MAHESHWARI),J. (GOVIND MATHUR),J. Sanjay