A V S Trust v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 17 (1) (1) And Ors
High Court
07 Dec 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
A V S Trust v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 17 (1) (1) And Ors
Date of order
07 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In A V S Trust v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 17 (1) (1) And Ors, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
rsk
1 909-WP-1820-21.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1820 OF 2021
A V S Trust
...Petitioner
Vs.
Income Tax Officer, Ward 17 (1) (1) and Ors.
...Respondents
-------
Ms. Rutuja N. Pawar a/w. Ms. Hetal Laghave for Petitioner.Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents.
-------
CORAM
DATED
:K. R. SHRIRAM &AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.:7 DECEMBER 2021.
P. C. :
Ms. Pawar tenders a letter dated 27/9/2021 which is taken onrecord and marked "X" for identification. Ms. Pawar states that petitionerwould apply to the Competent Authority as per the provisions of CircularNo.9/2015 dated 9/6/2015 for condoning delay in filing the returnselectronically and in that application petitioner will explain the reason asto why it could not file return earlier. Ms. Pawar submits that thisapplication will be filed within one week from today.
rsk
2 909-WP-1820-21.doc
2.Competent Authority shall decide the application within 2weeks of receiving the same and if the Competent Authority is satisfiedwith the explanation for delay offered by petitioner, Competent Authorityshall while condoning the delay, grant atleast two weeks time to file returnelectronically.
3.In Writ Petition Nos.1828/2021 and Writ PetitionNo.2973/2021 which are not on board, Ms. Pawar states that thepetitioner would file condonation of delay application in these twopetitions as well. Directions contained in Writ Petition No.1820/2021 toapply in aforesaid two petitions also.
Digitallysigned byRAJESHWARISUBODHRAJESHWARISUBODHKARVEKARVEDate:2021.12.0915:11:40+05304.In view of these directions, petitions disposed.
(AMIT B. BORKAR, J.)
( K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.