Case Law › High Court › Aalam Khan v. The Income Tax Officer,Non...

Aalam Khan v. The Income Tax Officer,Non-Corporate Ward-11(1),Chennai – 600 006

High Court 01 Jul 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Aalam Khan v. The Income Tax Officer,Non-Corporate Ward-11(1),Chennai – 600 006
Date of order
01 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Aalam Khan v. The Income Tax Officer,Non-Corporate Ward-11(1),Chennai – 600 006, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

W.P.No.4814 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 01.07.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.No.4814 of 2019&W.M.P.No.5468 of 2019 Aalam Khan ... Petitioner Vs. The Income Tax Officer,Non-Corporate Ward-11(1),Chennai – 600 006. ...Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in NCW 11(1)/AANPA7491A/2018-19, quash the order dated 21.01.2019 made therein and further direct the respondent to consider the rectification application dated 11.01.2019 on merits and pass a fresh assessment order for the assessment year 2016-17. For Petitioner : Mr.Sudakar.P.V.For Respondents: Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan Senior Standing Counsel ORDER The petitioner as well as the sole legal heir being his son, are stated to have passed away. Neither the learned Counsel for the petitioner nor the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.4814 of 2019 learned Standing Counsel are aware of the exact date of demise and as regards who survives, they state, on the basis of their enquiries, that it is the daughter-in-law of the petitioner. 2. In light of the above circumstances, I see no purpose in keeping this writ petition pending any further. It is made clear that in the event there are any proceedings consequent upon the impugned proceedings, liberty is granted to the person to whom such proceedings are directed, to revive this writ petition or challenge future proceedings, if any, in accordance with law. 01.07.2022 nst Index : Yes / NoSpeaking Order / Non Speaking Order To: The Income Tax Officer,Non-Corporate Ward-11(1),Chennai – 600 006. W.P.No.4814 of 2019 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.4814 of 2019 Dr.ANITA SUMANTH, J. nst W.P.No.4814 of 2019&W.M.P.No.5468 of 2019 01.07.2022
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan