Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί A.ananth v. The Principal Commissioner O...

A.ananth v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax,O/O. The Pcit,Madurai-1, Central Revenue Building,Bibikulam,Madurai – 625 002.2.The Income Tax Officer,Ward-1, Income T

High Court 01 Jul 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· mdubench
Parties
A.ananth v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax,O/O. The Pcit,Madurai-1, Central Revenue Building,Bibikulam,Madurai – 625 002.2.The Income Tax Officer,Ward-1, Income T
Date of order
01 Jul 2024
Assessment year(s)
β€”
Outcome
Dismissed

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In A.ananth v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax,O/O. The Pcit,Madurai-1, Central Revenue Building,Bibikulam,Madurai – 625 002.2.The Income Tax Officer,Ward-1, Income T, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal under Section 133, Section 148 of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

W.P.(MD) No.14177 of 2024 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.07.2024 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.(MD) No.14177 of 2024andW.M.P.(MD) Nos.12418 & 12419 of 2024 A.Ananth ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,O/o. the PCIT,Madurai-1, Central Revenue Building,Bibikulam,Madurai – 625 002.2.The Income Tax Officer,Ward-1, Income Tax Office, Nellai City Centre,Tiruchendur Road,Rahmath Nagar,Tirunelveli – 627 011. ... Respondents PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned 1/4 W.P.(MD) No.14177 of 2024 Notice under Section 148 dated 30.03.2024 in DIN & Notice No.ITBA/AST/S/148-1/2023-24/1063684963(1) and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and unsustainable. For petitioner : Mr.T.Selvan For respondents: Mr.J.Parekh Kumar Central Government Senior Standing Counsel***** ***** ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Central Government Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 30.03.2024, for the assessment year 2020-21, bearing reference in DIN & Notice No.ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2023-24/1063684963(1). 3. The impugned notice precedes the notice, dated 01.12.2022, under Section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 4. The petitioner has also replied to the impugned notice, dated 30.03.2024, 2/4 W.P.(MD) No.14177 of 2024 on 08.04.2024. However, the petitioner has, now, approached this Court to quash the impugned notice. 5. While the learned counsel for the petitioner was permitted to make submissions on merits, he has stated that an error occurred in the notice issued under Section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, issued on 01.12.2022. 6. The Impugned Notice does not warrant any interference at this stage, in the hands of this Court in this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner has acquised in the proceedings by filing reply on 08.04.2024. Therefore, this Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index : Yes / No01.07.2024Internet : Yes / Noapd 3/4 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.14177 of 2024 C.SARAVANAN, J. apd W.P.(MD) No.14177 of 2024 01.07.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan