Case LawHigh Court › A.arockiya Raj v. Income Tax Officer

A.arockiya Raj v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 17 Dec 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
A.arockiya Raj v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
17 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In A.arockiya Raj v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

W.P.No.38107 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.12.2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ W.P.No.38107 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.41234 and 41236 of 2024 A.Arockiya Raj ...Petitioner Vs. 1.Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward 15(1) Wanapathy Block, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. 2.National Faceless Assessment Centre, Ministry of Finance, Delhi 110 003. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the issue of the impugned assessment order dated 30.03.2022 for the assessment year 2015-16 relating to PAN: vide DIN:ITBA/AST/S/147/2021-22/1042170315(1) on the file of the second respondent and penalty orders passed under Section 271A dated 26.09.2022 vide DIN:ITBA/PNL/F/271A/2022-23/1045953115(1) and order W.P.No.38107 of 2024 orderunderSection271Bdated27.09.2022vide ITBA/PNL/F/271B/2022-2023 / 1046033585(1) on the file of the first respondent and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Madhavan For Respondents: Mrs.S.Premalatha, Standing Counsel for R1, R2. ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order of assessment dated 30.03.2022 relating to the assessment year 2015-16. 2. After submitting a brief while, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the impugned order suffers from lack of jurisdiction, to which the learned counsel for the respondents would submit that an appeal has already been filed challenging the impugned order, which is pending in Appeal No.NFAC/2014-15/10126232 before the second respondent. In response, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that they may be granted liberty to raise issues of jurisdiction in the appeal and they would also request that the appellate authority may dispose of the appeal within the specified time line. 3. The learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the appeal shall be disposed of within a period of three months. 4. In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed of. The Appellate Authority shall dispose of the appeal in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is always open to the petitioner to raise all legal issues including issue on jurisdiction before the Appellate Authority. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any views with regard to the merits of the appeal, the concerned authority shall dispose of the appeal on its own merits and in accordance with law. No costs. 17.12.2024 Speaking (or) Non Speaking OrderNeutral Citation: Yes/Noshk MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. W.P.No.38107 of 2024 To shk 1.Income Tax Officer, Non-Corporate Ward 15(1) Wanapathy Block, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. 2.National Faceless Assessment Centre, Ministry of Finance, Delhi 110 003. W.P.No.38107 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.41234 and 41236 of 2024 17.12.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan