A.b.a./3790/2018 Of Ashutosh Jha v. The State Of Jharkhand Through Income Tax Department
High Court
24 Jul 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
A.b.a./3790/2018 Of Ashutosh Jha v. The State Of Jharkhand Through Income Tax Department
Date of order
24 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In A.b.a./3790/2018 Of Ashutosh Jha v. The State Of Jharkhand Through Income Tax Department, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3790 of 2018Ashutosh Jha….. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Anr.….. Opp. Party ---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH---------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shray Mishra, Advocate.For the State: Miss. Amrita Sinha, adv.
---------
02/Dated: 24/07/2018
Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connectionwith the case registered under Sections 276(B) and 278(B)of Income Tax Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted thatat the time of filing of the present complaint case, thepetitioner had already cleared all his outstanding dues. It isfurther submitted co-accused have been grantedanticipatory bail in ABA No.3795/2018 passed by thisCourt.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayerfor bail.
Be that as it may, I am inclined to admit thepetitioner on anticipatory bail. The petitioner is directedto surrender in the court below within four weeks and inthe event of his arrest or surrender, the court below shallrelease him on bail on his furnishing bail bond ofRs.15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of thelike amount each to the satisfaction of learned SpecialJudge, Economic Offence, Dhanbad, in connection withEconomic Offence Case No.04 of 2018, subject to thecondition as laid down under Section 438(2) of theCr.P.C.
Fahim/
(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.