Case LawHigh Court › Abhay Chordia v. Assistant Commissioner...

Abhay Chordia v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle

High Court 24 Mar 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Abhay Chordia v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle
Date of order
24 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Abhay Chordia v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the above statement made by learnedcounsel for the petitioner, the impugned notice issued in thepresent case, for the reasons stated in the order dated27.01.2022 passed in the aforesaid cases, is also quashed and setaside and the petition is allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4576/2022 Abhay Chordia S/o Shri Ashok Kumar Jain, aged about 40 years,R/o 4459, KGB Ka Rasta, Johari Bazar, Jaipur. Versus ----Petitioner Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-4,1.Jaipur NCR Building, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur.Jaipur NCR Building, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur. 2. Union Of India, Through Finance Secretary, Ministry ofFinance (Department of Revenue), Central Board of DirectTaxes, North Block, New Delhi 110002Finance (Department of Revenue), Central Board of DirectTaxes, North Block, New Delhi 110002 ----Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Archit Bohra Advocate on behalf of Mr. Gunjan Pathak Advocate. of Mr. Gunjan Pathak Advocate. For Respondents: Mr. N.S. Bhati Advocate on behalf of Mr. Anuroop Singhi Advocate. HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 24/03/2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset wouldsubmit that the issue involved in this petition is no longer resintegra as it has been put to an end by Division Bench of thisCourt in the decision rendered on 27.01.2022 in Sudesh TanejaVs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3) & Anr. (D.B. Civil Writ PetitionNo. 969/2022 and batch of petitions) where the notices issuedunder Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 have been foundto be invalid and impermissible in law and quashed. In view of the above statement made by learnedcounsel for the petitioner, the impugned notice issued in thepresent case, for the reasons stated in the order dated27.01.2022 passed in the aforesaid cases, is also quashed and setaside and the petition is allowed. (SAMEER JAIN),J(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ MANOJ NARWANI /26
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan