Case LawHigh Court › Abhay Sharad Chaudhary v. Deputy/Assista...

Abhay Sharad Chaudhary v. Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Nagpurand Ors

High Court 19 Jul 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Abhay Sharad Chaudhary v. Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Nagpurand Ors
Date of order
19 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Abhay Sharad Chaudhary v. Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Nagpurand Ors, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2 962.ca.1708.23.odt 3.Since the petitioner has challenged the noticedated 22.07.2022 issued under Section 148 of the Act of1961, we are inclined to allow the amendment.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 962.ca.1708.23.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR C IVIL APPLICATION (W) NO.1708/2023 INWRIT PETITION NO. 2883/2023 Abhay Sharad Chaudhary Vs. Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Nagpurand Ors. ….…............................................................................................................................Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order or directions and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................……….. Mr. J. L. Bhoot, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. B. N. Mohata, Advocate for Respondents. CORAM: A.S.CHANDURKAR AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI,JJ..DATED: 19.07.2023 .In view of the pursis dated 03.07.2023, CivilApplication (W) No.1708/2023 is permitted to bewithdrawn. It is disposed of accordingly. CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO.1986/2023 .The petitioner seeks leave to amend the writpetition by raising a challenge to the assessment order dated30.05.2023 as well as the consequential demand issuedunder Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It issubmitted that during the pendency of the presentproceedings, the order of assessment has been passed. Noappeal has been preferred by the petitioner for challengingthe said assessment order. 2.The learned Counsel for the respondentsopposes the amendment by submitting that granting thesame would result in changing the nature of the presentproceedings. 2 962.ca.1708.23.odt 3.Since the petitioner has challenged the noticedated 22.07.2022 issued under Section 148 of the Act of1961, we are inclined to allow the amendment. If thechallenge to the said notice is upheld, the consequentialorder of assessment would also be affected. 4.Hence, Civil Application is allowed. 5.The amendment be carried out within a periodof one week from today. 6.Civil Application is disposed of. WRIT PETITION NO. 2883/2023 .Stand over three weeks to enable therespondents to file reply to the amended writ petition. (MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (A.S.CHANDURKAR, J.) RGurnule
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan