Abhimanyu Marotrao Dhage v. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, New
High Court
22 Aug 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Abhimanyu Marotrao Dhage v. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, New
Date of order
22 Aug 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Abhimanyu Marotrao Dhage v. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, New, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: 3]Accordingly, the petition is disposed of asnot pressed for orders.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
911-WP-2354-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 2354 OF 2025
(Abhimanyu Marotrao Dhage Vs. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, New
Delhi & Ors.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's Orders.
Court's or Judge's orders.
Mr. A.N. Agrawal, Counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Anand Parchure, Counsel for the respondents.
.....
CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND M.M. NERLIKAR, JJ. AUGUST 22, 2025
The learned Counsel for the respondentssubmits that the order impugned has been recalled byrespondent no.2 under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act,1961. He submits that copy of order will be furnished tothe petitioner’s Counsel. Be furnished.
2]In view of above, the learned Counsel forthe petitioner is not pressing for orders in the petition.
3]Accordingly, the petition is disposed of asnot pressed for orders.
(JUDGE)
(JUDGE)
Sumit
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue