In Abhishek Aggarwal v. Director Of Income Tax (Systems) And Others, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 4880 of 2014Decided on : 14.03.2014
Abhishek Aggarwal
Versus
Director of Income Tax (Systems) and others
. . . Petitioner
. . . Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY
PRESENT: Mr. Nitin Kant Setia, Advocate for the petitioner.
****
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
The petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus by directing respondents No.1 and 2 to cancel the PAN of respondent No.3.
2.After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies as available to him in accordance with law before the appropriate authority.
3.Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
March 14, 2014
J.Ram
(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue