Abzan Construction Private Limited, A Private Limited Company v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Patna
High Court
17 Dec 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Abzan Construction Private Limited, A Private Limited Company v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Patna
Date of order
17 Dec 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Abzan Construction Private Limited, A Private Limited Company v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Patna, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: The petition is disposed of as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17283 of 2011
======================================================
Abzan Construction Private Limited, a Private Limited Company, having its
office at 1/47, New Patliputra Colony, P.O. and P.S. Patliputra Colony, Patna – 800 013 through its Managing Director Md. T. Kaifi, Son of late S.M. Zaheer Alam, resident of 1/47 New Patliputra Colony, P.O. and P.S. Patliputra Colony, Patna – 800 013.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Patna having its office at 2[nd]
Floor, Central Revenue Building, Beerchand Patel Marg, P.O. - G.P.O.,
–P.S. Kotwali, Patna 800001,
2.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2, Patna having its office at 4[th] Floor, Lok Nayak Jaiprakash Bhawan, Dak Bungalow Chowraha, P.O. - G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, Patna – 800001.
.... .... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance:
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. D.V. Pathy, Advocate.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad and
Mrs. Archana Sinha, Advocates.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGHORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Learned advocate Mr. D.V. Pathy appears for the
4 17-12-2013
petitioner. He states that in view of the statements made in the counter affidavit, the cause of action does not survive.
The petition is disposed of as not pressed.
(R.M. Doshit, CJ)
Dilip.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.