Abzen Construction Private Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
03 Sep 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Abzen Construction Private Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
03 Sep 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Abzen Construction Private Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: The petition stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
8
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9000 of 2011
======================================================
ABZEN CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================Appearance :For the Petitioner/s: Mr.D.V.Pathy, AdvocateFor the Respondent/s: Mrs.Archana Sinha, Advocate======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
03-09-2020Petitioner prays for the following relief/s :
“i) that the respondent No.2 be directed to refundincome tax for the assessment year 2000-01forthwith.
ii) that for any other relief to which the petitioner isotherwise found entitled to.”
Sri D.V.Pathy, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly
states that with the passage of time, more so petitioner’sgrievance has already been redressed, the petition has becomeinfructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
The petition stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
( S. Kumar, J)
pallavi/-
U
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue