Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central-2[Nd]), Jodhpur v. Jai Singh Solanki
High Court
04 Oct 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central-2[Nd]), Jodhpur v. Jai Singh Solanki
Date of order
04 Oct 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central-2[Nd]), Jodhpur v. Jai Singh Solanki, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANAT JODHPUR-------------------------------------------------------------
D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.12023/2013
PETITIONERS :
1. Union of India through Secretary, Central Board ofDirect Taxes, Ministry of Finance, Government of India,North Block, New Delhi.
2. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (CCA), Jaipur.
3. The Director General of Income Tax (Investigation)N.C.R. Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur.
4. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-2[nd]), Jodhpur.
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS :
1. Jai Singh Solanki S/o Shri Ram Singh Solanki, agedabout 33 years, presently working as Computer
Operator under respondent No.4, R/o 71, SubhashColony, Bhagat Ki Kothi, Jodhpur.
2. The Central Administrative Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench,Jodhpur.
Date of Order : 04.10.2016
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHURHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA
Mr. K.K. Bissa for the petitioners
ORDER--------
It is submitted by learned counsel appearing
on behalf of the petitioners that the CentralAdministrative Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur hasalready reviewed certain other orders passed in theoriginal applications similar to the Original ApplicationNo.388/2011.
Looking to this fact, we deem it appropriate
to dispose of this petition for writ, keeping thepetitioner at liberty to move an application before theCentral Administrative Tribunal to review the orderdated 31.10.2012. If any such an application ispreferred by the petitioner before the CentralAdministrative Tribunal, then that shall be examined onmerits in accordance with law.
The writ petition stands disposed of
accordingly.
(KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA),J. (GOVIND MATHUR),J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.