Case LawHigh Court › Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax (C...

Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central-2[Nd]), Jodhpur v. Jai Singh Solanki

High Court 04 Oct 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central-2[Nd]), Jodhpur v. Jai Singh Solanki
Date of order
04 Oct 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central-2[Nd]), Jodhpur v. Jai Singh Solanki, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHANAT JODHPUR------------------------------------------------------------- D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.12023/2013 PETITIONERS : 1. Union of India through Secretary, Central Board ofDirect Taxes, Ministry of Finance, Government of India,North Block, New Delhi. 2. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (CCA), Jaipur. 3. The Director General of Income Tax (Investigation)N.C.R. Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur. 4. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-2[nd]), Jodhpur. VERSUS RESPONDENTS : 1. Jai Singh Solanki S/o Shri Ram Singh Solanki, agedabout 33 years, presently working as Computer Operator under respondent No.4, R/o 71, SubhashColony, Bhagat Ki Kothi, Jodhpur. 2. The Central Administrative Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench,Jodhpur. Date of Order : 04.10.2016 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHURHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA Mr. K.K. Bissa for the petitioners ORDER-------- It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that the CentralAdministrative Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur hasalready reviewed certain other orders passed in theoriginal applications similar to the Original ApplicationNo.388/2011. Looking to this fact, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this petition for writ, keeping thepetitioner at liberty to move an application before theCentral Administrative Tribunal to review the orderdated 31.10.2012. If any such an application ispreferred by the petitioner before the CentralAdministrative Tribunal, then that shall be examined onmerits in accordance with law. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. (KAILASH CHANDRA SHARMA),J. (GOVIND MATHUR),J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan