Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range -1, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh v. M/S South Eastern Coalfields Limited Seepat Road, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
High Court
03 Aug 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range -1, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh v. M/S South Eastern Coalfields Limited Seepat Road, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
Date of order
03 Aug 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range -1, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh v. M/S South Eastern Coalfields Limited Seepat Road, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned byPAWANPAWANKUMARKUMARDate:2025.08.0511:17:02+0530
2025:CGHC:38356-DB
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
TAXC No. 27 of 2022
1 - Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range -1, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
... Appellant
versus
1 - M/s South Eastern Coalfields Limited Seepat Road, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent
For Appellant:Mr. Amit Choudhary and Mr. Ajay Kumarni, AdvocatesFor Respondent(s) :Mr. Ajit Korde and Mr. M. K. Sinha, AdvocatesFor Respondent(s) :Mr. Ajit Korde and Mr. M. K. Sinha, Advocates
Hon’ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal and
Hon’ble Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, JJ
Judgment on Board
04/08/2025
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
Learned counsel for the appellant at the outset submits that since the assessment
order has been passed on 28.09.2021, the appeal has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the appeal is disposed off as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge
Sd/-(Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge
Pawan
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.