Case Law › High Court › Advantage India v. Asstt. Commissioner O...

Advantage India v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-16 & Anr

High Court 06 Dec 2017 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

06 Dec 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Advantage India v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-16 & Anr, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10737/2017 ADVANTAGE INDIA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Satyen Sethi, Mr. Arta Taran Panda and Ms. Gargi Sethee, Advocates. versus ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-16 & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R % 06.12.2017 Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to raise all issues relating to re-opening, if required, at the appellate stage. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. SANJIV KHANNA, J. DECEMBER 06, 2017 NA PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.