Ag.cj (Oral v. Manjunatha Cotton And Ginning Factory1(2013)359 Itr 565 (Karn)]. The Appeal Is Accordinglydismissed

- -1- ITA No.128/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11 DAY OF OCTOBER 2017 PRESENT| THE HON’BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHLEF JUSTICE. AND| THE HON’'BLE MR, JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMARINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.128/2016 BETWEEN ° 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX LTU, JSS TOWERS BSK III STAGE BANGALORE —- 560 O85 2 |THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-T AX LTU, JSS TOWERS BSK III STAGE BANGALORE - 560 085. .. APPELLANTS (BY SRI E.I.L.SANMATHI FOR SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATES) AND : M/S STATE BANK OF MYSORE.HEAD OFFICEFINANCE & ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT|K.G.ROADBANGALORE —- 560 O09 .. RESPONDENT| (BY Ms.TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR FORSRI T.SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATES) | THIS INCOME JTAXK APPEAL [IS FILED UNDER SECTIO260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TQ FORMULATE THE| ITA No.128/2016 SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE}ORDER DATED 14.09.2015 IN ITA NO.1162/BANG/2014, PASSEDBY THE ITAT, BENGALURU FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION,THIS” DAY,THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE, DELIVERED |THEFOLLOWING:JUDGMENT Ag.CJ (Oral): Sri E.I.Sanmathi, learned Counsel appearing for |the appellants fairly submits that the question raised inthis appeal is answered against the appellants py thisCourt InCIT v. Manjunatha Cotton and Ginning Factory1(2013)359 ITR 565 (Karn)]. The appeal is accordinglydismissed. Appeal dismissed. LB. Sd/-| ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE| Sda/- JUDGE