Ag.cjj (Oral v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. [(2012)349 Itr 98 (Karn)]. Tne Appeal Is Accordingly Dismissed
High Court
06 Dec 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Ag.cjj (Oral v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. [(2012)349 Itr 98 (Karn)]. Tne Appeal Is Accordingly Dismissed
Date of order
06 Dec 2017
Assessment year(s)
2010-2011
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ag.cjj (Oral v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. [(2012)349 Itr 98 (Karn)]. Tne Appeal Is Accordingly Dismissed, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Tne appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITA No.845/2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6 DAY OF DECEMBER 2017
PRESENT|
THE HON’BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND|
THE HON’'BLE MR, JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMARINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.845/2017
BETWEEN °
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
CIT(A), LTU, JSS TOWERS
BSK III STAGEBENGALURU —- 560 O85BENGALURU —- 560 O85
2 |THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME-TAX, LIUINCOME-TAX, LIU
JSS TOWERS, BSK III STAGE
BENGALURU - 560 085.
.. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND & SRI DILIP, ADVOCATES)
AND :
M/S DELL INTERNATIONAL SERVICESINDIA PVT. LTD. |(FORMERLY KNOWN AS PEROT SYSTEMSTSI (I) PVT. LTD.)12/1, 12/2A,13/1A, DIVYASHREE GARDENSCHALLAGUTTA VILLAGEVARTHUR HOBLIBENGALURU - 560 0/71
.. RESPONDENT|
THIS INCOME JTAXK APPEAL [IS FILED UNDER SECTIO260-A OF I.I.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE- THESUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE}
ITA No.845/2017
ORDER DATED 28.06.2017 PASSED BY THE ITAT, BENGALURUIN IT(TP) A NO.636 (BANG) 2016 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR-2010-2011.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION,THIS DAY,THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEDELIVERED THE!FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Ag.CJj (Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellants fairly submits that|the questions raised in this appeal are answered against theappellants by this Court in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. |[(2012)349 ITR 98 (Karn)]. Tne appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
LB.
Sd/-|
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE|
Sd/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue