Agilent Technologies Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle & Anr
High Court
03 Dec 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Agilent Technologies Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle & Anr
Date of order
03 Dec 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Agilent Technologies Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle & Anr, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: The petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJABAND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARHCWP-17332-2020Decided on: 3[rd]December, 2020
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE & ANR
.... RESPONDENTS
CORAM:JUSTICE S. MURALIDHARJUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
,,,
Present:Mr. Rohit Tiwari, Advocate for the Petitioner,
Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Advocate for the Respondents,
Dr. S. Muralidhar, J
OK
1. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the Respondents’ non-grant of refund in the sumof Rs. 4.25 crores along with interest under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act,1961 for the Assessment Years 2010-2011 and 2011-2012.
2. Mr. Tajender K Joshi, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents submitsthat if a direction is issued by this Court for time-bound processing of the refundapplication of the Petitioner, it will be complied with by the Respondents,
3. It is accordingly directed that the Petitioner’s refund application be processed inaccordance with law and appropriate orders thereon be issued not later than 15[th]February, 2021.
4. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.
(S. MURALIDHAR)
JUDGE
3[rd]December, 2020sham
Whether speaking/reasonedSHAM SUNDER2020.12.03 16:01Mysttetaer reportaI attest to the accuracy andintegrity of this documentHigh Court, Chandigarh
(AVNEESH JHINGAN)JUDGE
Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue