Agricultural Market Committee v. Agricultural Marketcommittee Reported In (2011) 336 Itr 641 (A.p
High Court
03 Sep 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Agricultural Market Committee v. Agricultural Marketcommittee Reported In (2011) 336 Itr 641 (A.p
Date of order
03 Sep 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Agricultural Market Committee v. Agricultural Marketcommittee Reported In (2011) 336 Itr 641 (A.p, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO
I.T.T.A. No. 332 of 2012
DATED: 03.09.2012
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax ..Petitioner
And
Agricultural Market Committee . Respondent
JUDGMENT:- (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
Sri S.R. Ashok, learned senior counsel for the appellant-Revenue and Smt.K.Lalitha, learned Standing Counsel for AgriculturalMarket Committee state that this appeal by the Revenue preferredagainst the common order of Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal,Visakhapatnam dated 04.04.2008 insofar it pertains to I.T.A.No.243/Vizag/07, requires to be dismissed in view of the decision ofthis Court in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Agricultural MarketCommittee reported in (2011) 336 ITR 641 (A.P).
In the light of the decision of this Court referred to above, thedirection issued by the Tribunal to the Commissioner of Income-Tax togrant registration to the respondent-assessee under Section 12-A of theIncome-Tax Act, suffers from no infirmity. No substantial question oflaw arises for consideration in this appeal.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order asto costs.
__________________
GODA RAGHURAM, J
03.09.2012
bcj
J
_________________________
M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO,
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.