Agricultural Market Committee,Bapatla v. Agriculture Marketcommittee[[1
High Court
06 Dec 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Agricultural Market Committee,Bapatla v. Agriculture Marketcommittee[[1
Date of order
06 Dec 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Agricultural Market Committee,Bapatla v. Agriculture Marketcommittee[[1, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal.
Decision: 87/Vizag/2007 is set aside and theorder of the Commissioner (Appeals) confirming the order ofAssessment dated 22-1-2007 is confirmed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
ITTA No. 467 of 2012
Dated: 06-12-2012
Between:
The Commissioner of Income TaxGuntur
And
Agricultural Market Committee,Bapatla.
…Appellant
…Respondent.
Judgment:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
It is represented by Sri S.R.Ashok, learned Senior Counselappearing for the appellant-Revenue in this appeal preferred underSection 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 that this appeal requires tobe allowed in terms of the judgment of a learned Division Bench of thisCourt in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Agriculture MarketCommittee[[1]].
Smt K.Lalitha, learned Standing Counsel for the AgriculturalMarket Committee fairly concedes the legal position that this appealrequires to be allowed.
In view of the submission above, the appeal is allowed. Theorder dated 28-11-2008 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Visakhapatnam Bench in ITA No. 87/Vizag/2007 is set aside and theorder of the Commissioner (Appeals) confirming the order ofAssessment dated 22-1-2007 is confirmed. No costs.
6[th] December, 2012
_________________________
GODA RAGHURAM, J
GRR
_______________________________
M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
[1](2011) 337 ITR 299 (AP)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.