Case LawHigh Court › Agricultural Market Committee,Rajampet,...

Agricultural Market Committee,Rajampet, Kadapa Dist v. Agricultural

High Court 06 Dec 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Agricultural Market Committee,Rajampet, Kadapa Dist v. Agricultural
Date of order
06 Dec 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Agricultural Market Committee,Rajampet, Kadapa Dist v. Agricultural, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO ITTA No. 495 of 2012 Dated: 06-12-2012 Between: Commissioner of Income TaxTirupati And Agricultural Market Committee,Rajampet, Kadapa Dist. …Appellant …Respondent. Judgment:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram) It is fairly stated by Sri S.R.Ashok, learned Senior Counselappearing for the appellant-Revenue in this appeal that this appealrequires to be rejected in the light of the decision of a learned DivisionBench of this Court in Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Agricultural Market Committee[[1]]. In view of the submission and in the light of the judgment of thisCourt referred to above, the appeal is dismissed and the order of theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad in ITA No.301/Hyd/2008 is confirmed. No costs. 6[th] December, 2012 _________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J GRR _______________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J [1](2011) 336 ITR 641 (DB)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan