Case LawHigh Court › Ahmedabad New Cotton Mills Co.ltd v. Com...

Ahmedabad New Cotton Mills Co.ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance

High Court 23 Jun 1998 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Ahmedabad New Cotton Mills Co.ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance
Date of order
23 Jun 1998
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ahmedabad New Cotton Mills Co.ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance, the High Court (1998) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- AHMEDABAD NEW COTTON MILLS CO.LTD.

Decision: The reference is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 101 of 1984 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKER and MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- AHMEDABAD NEW COTTON MILLS CO.LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR Manish J Shah for JP SHAH for Petitioner MR RP BHATT for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE C.K.THAKKER and MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 23/06/98 ORAL JUDGEMENT �The following question is referred for the opinion of this Court : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in disallowing the interest of Rs.47,331/- paid u/s. 2.�In Saurashtra Cements and Chemical Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, this Court, after considering various decisions on the point, held that the interest paid for late payment of tax cannot be taken as expenditure for the purpose of deduction. The principle laid down in Saurashtra Cements and Chemicals Industries Ltd. (Supra) was reiterated by this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ashok Mills Ltd. 218 ITR 526 and recently in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Raipur Manufacturing Co. 231 ITR 598. 3.�In view of the fact the point is convered by the above decisions, in our opinion, the reference must be answered in the affirmative i.e. against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue. The reference is accordingly disposed of. No Costs. ���****** jitu
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan