Case LawHigh Court › Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant C...

Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) And Ors

High Court 16 Feb 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) And Ors
Date of order
16 Feb 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) And Ors, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Issue: APPL.7791/2017 The applicant/assessee seeks clarification as to whether one-time lease rent paid for specific periods in terms of the various lease agreements would be subjected to the Tax Deducted at Source (TDS).

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~SSSSS-1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.M. 7791/2017 & 16253/2017 IN W.P.(C) 7682/2015 AJAY ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through : Ms. Malini Sud, Advocate. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate, for Respondent No.1. Ms. Kailash Golani, Advocate, for Respondent No.2. Ms. Ruhsheet. J. Saluja and Sh. Nitesh Shrivastava, Advocates, for Respondent No.3. Sh. Sunil Gupta, CA, for Respondent No.3. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R% 28.04.2017 C.M. APPL.7791/2017 The applicant/assessee seeks clarification as to whether one-time lease rent paid for specific periods in terms of the various lease agreements would be subjected to the Tax Deducted at Source (TDS). Having regard to the findings in the judgment and the summary of conclusions in para 20(1), this Court is of the opinion that the amounts characterized as lease, whether paid periodically, i.e. Page 1 of 2 annually, monthly or quarterly, or paid as one-time lease rent in lump sum, would be tax deductible. The application is disposed of in terms of these clarifications. C.M. APPL.16253/2017 Issue notice. Ms. Malini Sud, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the petitioner; Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No.1 and Ms. Kailash Golani, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No.2 and request for short accommodation to obtain instructions. List on 21.07.2017. It is open to the applicant to serve notice of this application to all other petitioners who had approached this Court and are bound by the common judgment. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J APRIL 28, 2017/ajk NAJMI WAZIRI, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan