Case Law › High Court › Ajay Jain v. Assistant Commissioner Of I...

Ajay Jain v. Assistant Commissioner Of Incometax Circle 59(1),Delhi & Ors

High Court 03 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

03 Dec 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ajay Jain v. Assistant Commissioner Of Incometax Circle 59(1),Delhi & Ors, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.Pending application also stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~80 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +W.P.(C) 4341/2023 AJAY JAIN .....Petitioner Through:Mr Ved Jain, Mr Nishay Kantoor, MsSonia Dodeja Mr Divyansh Dubeyand Mr Govind Gupta, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 59(1),DELHI & ORS. .....RespondentsThrough:MrAbhishekMaratha,SSC,MrApoorv Agarwal, Mr Parth Samwal,JSCs, Ms Nupur Sharma, Mr GauravSingh,MsMuskaanGoel,MrHimanshu Gaur and Mr KamakshrajSinghandMrYamitJetley,Advocates for the Revenue CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRUHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA O R D E R%03.12.2024CM APPL. 70526/2024 (for withdrawal) 1.This is an application filed by the petitioner seeking to withdraw theabove captioned petition. 2.The application is allowed. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.Pending application also stands disposed of. All rights and contentions ofthe parties are reserved. 3.The hearing scheduled on 07.12.2024 is cancelled. 4.The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. VIBHU BAKHRU, J DECEMBER 03, 2024M SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J Click here to check corrigendum, if any

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.