Ajay Kumar Lal v. Union Of India
High Court
08 Mar 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
Ajay Kumar Lal v. Union Of India
Date of order
08 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Ajay Kumar Lal v. Union Of India, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No.1945 of 2012
Ajay Kumar Lal ..... Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, through the Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Dhanbad & Anr. …. Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVNEET KUMAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashish Kr. Shekhar, Advocate For the State : APP
-----
16/15.03.2022 It appears that in order dated 08.03.2022, there were typographical mistakes and it is found that in paragraph 3 of the said order, in place of Complaint Case No.05 of 2012, it was wrongly typed Complaint Case No.55 of 2012 and in paragraph 7 of the said order, in place of I.A. No.4742 of 2020, it was wrongly typed as I.A. No.4742 of 20202.
Accordingly, let these typographical mistakes be read correctly in order dated 08.03.2022 and in place of Complaint Case No.55 of 2012, it should be read as complaint Case No.5 of 2012 and in place of I.A. No.4742 of 20202, it should be read as I.A. No.4742 of 2020.
Let this order be always issued along with order dated 08.03.2022.
(Navneet Kumar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue