Ajay Paliwal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central, Ludhiana
High Court
07 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ajay Paliwal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central, Ludhiana
Date of order
07 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ajay Paliwal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central, Ludhiana, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Krishan Mehta, Advocate,for the respondent-revenue.1.Whether Reporters of local papers may beallowed to see the judgment?2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?3.Whether the judgment should be reported inthe Digest?
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
W.T.A. No. 35 of 2002
DATE OF DECISION: January 7, 2009
Ajay Paliwal
…Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central, Ludhiana
…Respondent
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMARHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLAPresent:Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Senior Advocate, withMr. Prashant Bansal, Advocate,for the appellant-assessee.Mr. Krishan Mehta, Advocate,for the respondent-revenue.1.Whether Reporters of local papers may beallowed to see the judgment?2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?3.Whether the judgment should be reported inthe Digest?
M.M. KUMAR, J.
For orders see W.T.A. No. 7 of 2002.
January 7, 2009
(M.M. KUMAR)JUDGE(H.S. BHALLA) JUDGE
Pkapoor
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue