Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί Ajay Shantilal Lalwani (Huf v. The Joint...

Ajay Shantilal Lalwani (Huf v. The Joint Commissioner Of Incometax – 1 And Another

High Court 14 Feb 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· hcaurdb
Parties
Ajay Shantilal Lalwani (Huf v. The Joint Commissioner Of Incometax – 1 And Another
Date of order
14 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
β€”
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Ajay Shantilal Lalwani (Huf v. The Joint Commissioner Of Incometax – 1 And Another, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

1 ca 12146.19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12146 OF 2019 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (ST.) NO. 29520 OF 2019 Ajay Shantilal Lalwani (HUF) .. Applicant Versus The Joint Commissioner of IncomeTax – 1 and another.. Respondents Shri Raviraj R. Chandak, Advocate for the Applicant.Shri Alok Sharma, Advocate for Respondents. CORAM :S. V. GANGAPURWALA ANDSHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE :14TH FEBRURY 2020. FINAL ORDER : .This is an application for condonation of delay of 106 dayscaused in filing the tax appeal. 2.Mr. Sharma, the learned advocate for respondentsstrenuously opposes the application on the ground that nosufficient ground is mentioned. 3.Considering the reasons given in the application and moreparticularly in para No. 3 and 4, the delay caused in filing thetax appeal is condoned. The civil application is allowed in termsof prayer clause β€œC”. In case the appeal otherwise complies withall other requirements, then the appeal be registered. 2 ca 12146.19 [SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/Feb. 20
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan