Case Law › High Court › Ajit Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax...

Ajit Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala And Others

High Court 04 Jul 2017 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

04 Jul 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ajit Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala And Others, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 6754 of 1993 Decided on : 04.07.2017 Ajit Singh Versus . . . Petitioner Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL PRESENT: None for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Addl. AG, Punjab. Mr. Z.S. Klar, Advocatefor respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. S.S. Brar, Advocatefor respondent No.5. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) Dismissed for want of prosecution. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE July 04, 2017J.Ram (AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:Whether Reportable: Yes/NoYes/No

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.