Akash Tatva Investments Pvt. Ltd v. The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle I- Pune
High Court
13 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Akash Tatva Investments Pvt. Ltd v. The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle I- Pune
Date of order
13 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Akash Tatva Investments Pvt. Ltd v. The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle I- Pune, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.670 OF 2003
Akash Tatva Investments Pvt. Ltd...AppellantVersusThe Asstt. Commissioner of Income TaxCircle I- Pune..Respondent
Mr. Ruturaj Gurjar i/b. S.N.Inamdar for appellant.
CORAM:M.S.SANKLECHA &SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ. DATE :13[th] June 2018.
P.C.
1]This appeal under section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was admitted on 3[rd] November 2004 on the following substantial question of law:-
“(a)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the
case, the appellate Tribunal is right in law in holding that interest paid on borrowing made to require one lot of investments, must be
deducted from another lot of investments entirely made out of own source in computing deduction under section 80M?”
2]Mr. Gurjar, learned Counsel appearing in support of the
appeal states that in spite of best efforts on his part, he is unable to get any instructions from the appellant assessee.
3]In the above view, it appears that the appellant – assessee is not interested in prosecuting this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.