Case LawHigh Court › Alka Kotahwala v. Principal Chief Commis...

Alka Kotahwala v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jeevannidhi-2, Lic Building, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan

High Court 27 Aug 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Alka Kotahwala v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jeevannidhi-2, Lic Building, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan
Date of order
27 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Alka Kotahwala v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jeevannidhi-2, Lic Building, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan, the High Court (2024) decided the matter under Section 153C of the Income-tax Act.

Decision: 3.In view of the statement made by counsel for therespondents, the present writ petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9674/2024 Alka Kotahwala, W/o Shri Pramod Kotahwala, Aged About 66Years, R/o Kotahwala Building, Kotahwala Market, Tripolia Bazar,Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, JeevanNidhi-2, LIC Building, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan,302005Nidhi-2, LIC Building, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan,302005 2. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-2,Room No. 410, 4Th Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-2, LIC Building,Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302005Room No. 410, 4Th Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-2, LIC Building,Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302005 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bipin Gupta, Adv.Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Adv.Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Adv.For Respondent(s): Mr. Siddharth Bapna, Adv.with Mr. Meyhul Mittal, Mr. Sarvesh Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 28/08/2024 1.Petitioner has filed this writ petition aggrieved by thenotices issued under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act. 2.It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for therespondents that the satisfaction note along with relevant materialwould be supplied to the petitioner and she can thereafter, submither reply/ objections to the notices within thirty days. 3.In view of the statement made by counsel for therespondents, the present writ petition is disposed of. 4.Respondents are directed to supply the satisfactionnote and the relevant material to the petitioner within a period offour weeks. On receipt of the relevant material and satisfactionnote, petitioner is required to file her reply within a period of fourweeks from the date of receipt of the satisfaction note andrelevant material. 5.Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J (PANKAJ BHANDARI),J CHANDAN /37
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan