Alka Rajvanshi Jain v. Union Of India, Through Central Bureau Of Investigationjodhpur
High Court
11 Sep 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Alka Rajvanshi Jain v. Union Of India, Through Central Bureau Of Investigationjodhpur
Date of order
11 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Alka Rajvanshi Jain v. Union Of India, Through Central Bureau Of Investigationjodhpur, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 8694/2022
Alka Rajvanshi Jain W/o Shri Amit Jain, Aged About 56 Years,R/o 533 Umaid Heritage Jodhpur Presently Working AsCommissioner (Appeals) Income Tax Deptt. Jodhpur
----Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India, Through Central Bureau Of InvestigationJodhpur
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 8696/2022
Amit Jain S/o Shri Mahaveer Prasad Jain, Aged About 56 Years,R/o 533 Umaid Haritage Jodhpur Presently Working As ChiefSignal And Telecom Engineer Indian Railways Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India, Through Central Bureau Of InvestigationJodhpur
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Suresh Kumbhat,
Mr. Sheetal Kumbhat
: Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit, Dy. SG for UOI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHITJudgment
11/09/2023
01-Hkkjrla?k dh vksj ls fMIVh ,lth Jh eqds”k jktiqjksfgr mifLFkr gS]ftuds }kjk crk;k x;k fd ekeys esa ,Qvkj gks pqdh gSA02-,Qvkj dh izekf.kr izfrfyfi dh QksVksizfr is”k dh xbZ ftls vfHkys[kij j[kk tkosA ,Qvkj is”k gks tkus ls ;kphx.k bl ekeys esa vkxs dksbZ dk;Zokghugha pkgrs gSaA
(2 of 2)
03-vr% ;g nksuksa QkStnkjh fofo/k ;kfpdk,a fu’izHkkoh gks xbZ gSA rnuqlkj];g nksuksa QkStnkjh fofo/k ;kfpdk,a o LFkxu ;kfpdk,a fu’izHkkoh gksus ds vk/kkj ijfujLr dh tkrh gSA
498-499--SN Lohra/-
(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.