Case LawHigh Court › All Are Resident Of Govind Nagar, Sector...

All Are Resident Of Govind Nagar, Sector 13, Udaipur (Raj v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Income Taxdepartment, 6, Fatehpura, Udaipur

High Court 29 Apr 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
All Are Resident Of Govind Nagar, Sector 13, Udaipur (Raj v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Income Taxdepartment, 6, Fatehpura, Udaipur
Date of order
29 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In All Are Resident Of Govind Nagar, Sector 13, Udaipur (Raj v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Income Taxdepartment, 6, Fatehpura, Udaipur, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty asaforesaid.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2575/2008 Legal representatives of Dharam Narayan Suhalka 1. Smt. Sushila Devi Suhalka W/o Late Shri Dharam NarayanSuhalka, aged about 59 years, Suhalka, aged about 59 years, 2. Vikas Suhalka S/o Late Sh. Dharam Narayan Suhalka, agedabout 39 years, about 39 years, 3. Jatain Suhalka S/o Late Sh. Dharam Narayan Suhalka,aged about 36 years, aged about 36 years, All are resident of Govind Nagar, Sector 13, Udaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Income TaxDepartment, 6, Fatehpura, Udaipur. 2. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Udaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s)For Respondent(s) : Mr. Lalit Pareek. : Mr. K.K. Bissa. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI 29/04/2021 Order Applications have been filed by the petitioner seeking tobring on record the legal representatives of the deceasedpetitioner, condonation of delay in filing the application and settingaside abatement. For the reasons indicated in the applications supported byaffidavits, the same are allowed. The abatement is set aside. Thedelay in filing the applications is condoned. The legal representatives of the deceased petitioner asindicated in the application are taken on record. Amended cause title is also taken on record. Office is directed to amend the online record. Another application has been filed by the petitioners seekingwithdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to avail the schemeunder Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act 2020. In view of the submissions made in the application, the sameis allowed. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty asaforesaid. 94-pradeep/- (ARUN BHANSALI),J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan