Case Law β€Ί High Court β€Ί Allcargo Shipping Company Private Limite...

Allcargo Shipping Company Private Limited v. Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central Range – 10 And Others

High Court 05 Nov 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court Β· newos
Parties
Allcargo Shipping Company Private Limited v. Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central Range – 10 And Others
Date of order
05 Nov 2012
Assessment year(s)
β€”
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Allcargo Shipping Company Private Limited v. Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central Range – 10 And Others, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Decision: 4.The writ petition is disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below β€” read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order β€” as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1599 OF 2012 Allcargo Shipping Company Private Limited..Petitioner.VersusAdditional Commissioner of Income-tax,Central Range – 10 and others..Respondents. Mr.S.E. Dastur, Senior Advocate with Mr.Madhur Agarwal, Mr.B.V. Jhaveri, Ms.Sanida Vedpathak i/by Maneksha & Sethna for the petitioner.Mr.Arvind Pinto with Ms.Padma Divakar for the respondents. P.C. : CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ. DATE : 5[th] November 2012 1.This writ petition is filed to challenge the order passed by the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Range – 10, Mumbai on 13[th ]June 2012 whereby the application of the petitioner in opting Tonnage Tax Scheme has been rejected. 2.Counsel for the Revenue, on instructions, states that since the impugned order is barred by limitation, the said order be quashed and set aside with liberty to the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Range – 10, Mumbai to pass fresh order on merits and in accordance with law. 3.Accordingly, the impugned order dated 13[th] June 2012 is quashed and set aside and the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Range – 10, Mumbai is directed to pass fresh order on merits and in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. 4.The writ petition is disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs. (M.S. Sanklecha, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
βœ… File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) β†’ πŸ’¬ Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only β€” not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press Β· Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
Β© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP Β· LLPIN ACN-4920 Β· Jaipur, Rajasthan