Case LawHigh Court › Allied Nippon Private Limited v. Assista...

Allied Nippon Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 1(1) Delhi & Ors

High Court 28 May 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Allied Nippon Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 1(1) Delhi & Ors
Date of order
28 May 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Allied Nippon Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 1(1) Delhi & Ors, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: Consequently, all further proceedings impugning the assessment order are also liable to be set aside.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7193/2025 & CM APPL. 32384/2025 ALLIED NIPPON PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Mr. Shivam Yadav, Mr. Utkarsa Gupta for Mr. Salil Kapoor, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1) DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, SSC with Ms. Sakashi Shairwal, JSC, Mr. Akshat Singh, JSCs & Mr. Gaoraang Ranjan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRUHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAO R D E R28.05.2025 % 1. Issue notice. The learned counsel appearing for the Revenue accepts notice. 2. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning a notice dated 29.07.2022 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act] and the assessment order dated 30.05.2023 passed pursuant to the said notice. It is the petitioner’s case that the notice was issued beyond the period prescribed for limitation and, therefore, is liable to be struck down. Consequently, all further proceedings impugning the assessment order are also liable to be set aside. 3.Prima facie, the petitioner’s challenge is merited and is covered by the decision of this Court in Ram Balram Buildhome Pvt. Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer and Anr.: Neutral Citation No.2025: DHC:547-DB. However, the learned counsel for the Revenue points out that the petitioner has already preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT (A)] which is pending. 4.In the peculiar facts of the case, we consider it apposite to dispose of the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to raise the objection regarding the notice dated 29.07.2022 before the learned CIT(A). It is directed that if any such application is filed within a period of two weeks from date, the learned CIT(A) shall consider the same as expeditiously as possible and, in any event, within a period of eight weeks from the date, the application is filed. VIBHU BAKHRU, J MAY 28, 2025/ ‘A’ TEJAS KARIA, J Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan