Alok Aradhe J., Delivered The Following v. Chandrashekar, Learned Counsel For The Assessee
High Court
07 Jul 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Alok Aradhe J., Delivered The Following v. Chandrashekar, Learned Counsel For The Assessee
Date of order
07 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Alok Aradhe J., Delivered The Following v. Chandrashekar, Learned Counsel For The Assessee, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to revive the same, if occasion so arises.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
BETWEEN:
ITA NO.160 OF 2016
M/s.Consulate Constructions represented by its Partner Mr.Fazal Ur Rahaman Unit No.102, Consulate I No.1, Richmond Road Bangalore - 560 025.
... Appellant
(By Sri V Chandrashekar, Advocate)
AND:
The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle1(1) Bangalore.
... Respondent
(By Sri. K.V. Aravind, Advocate)
- - -
This ITA is filed under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act 1961, arising out of order dated: 24.09.2015 passed in ITA No.1209-1211/Bang/2014, for the Assessment year 2004-05 to 2006-07 praying to:
i) To formulate the substantial questions of law as stated above and answer the same in favour of the appellant. ii) To allow the appeal and set aside the findings to the extent against the appellant in the common order of the Income Tax Appellant Tribunal, Bangalore 'C' Bench,
Bengaluru in ITA No.1209-1211/Bang/2014 relating to assessment years 2004-05 to 2006-07.
iii) To pass such other orders, as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper to meet the ends of Justice.
This ITA coming on for hearing, this day,
Alok Aradhe J., delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Mr. V. Chandrashekar, learned counsel for the assessee.
Mr. K.V. Aravind, learned counsel for the Revenue.
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal.
The said memo is placed on record.
For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to revive the same, if occasion so arises.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.