Alok Kumar v. State Of Rajasthan Through P.p
High Court
15 Jun 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Alok Kumar v. State Of Rajasthan Through P.p
Date of order
15 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Alok Kumar v. State Of Rajasthan Through P.p, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 7138 / 2018
Alok Kumar S/o Ramkumar, R/o 11, Income Tax Colony,Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.S.Godara, P.P.
Mr. Kapil Gupta
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR VYAS (V.J.)
Order
15/06/2018
Learned Public Prosecutor seeks time to procure case
diary.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that learnedSessions Judge has rejected the application for anticipatory bailonly on the ground that as per case diary, apprehension of thepetitioner’s arrest is baseless and rejected the same as prematureapplication but since investigation is still pending, his only prayeris that Investigating Officer be directed that in case, if thepetitioner’s arrest is required in the instant matter, let he be givennotice prior to his arrest.
Considering all relevant aspects, facts andcircumstances, it deems appropriate that SHO / InvestigatingOfficer concerned is directed that in case of requirement of arrest
of the petitioner, prior to arrest the petitioner, he will give 10 daysnotice. Only thereafter, he will proceed in the matter.
The criminal misc. bail application is disposed of.
(VIJAY KUMAR VYAS (V.J.)),J.
Dheeraj/114
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.