Alok Virk v. Income Tax Appelate Tribunal, Chanidgarh Bench, Chandigarh Andanother
High Court
03 Oct 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Alok Virk v. Income Tax Appelate Tribunal, Chanidgarh Bench, Chandigarh Andanother
Date of order
03 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Alok Virk v. Income Tax Appelate Tribunal, Chanidgarh Bench, Chandigarh Andanother, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
248
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision :3.10. 2019
CWP-14139-2019 (O&M)
Alok Virk
...... Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Appelate Tribunal, Chanidgarh Bench, Chandigarh andAnother
oe ReSpondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JIUSTICE AJAY TEWAR*HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK HARNARESH SINGH GILL;;;*HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK HARNARESH SINGH GILL;;;
Present ;Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Ajiteshwar Singh, Advocate for
Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocatefor respondent No.2.
;;;
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
For detailed order see order of even date passed in|CWP No.
T4137FJZOTtitled asNamrita Singh vs.Income Tax Appelate Tribunal,
Chanidgarh Bench, Chandigarh and Another.
(AJAY TEWARIT)
JUDGE
3.10.2019anuradha
(HARNARESH SINGH GILL)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned$Yes/NoWhether reportable$Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue