Case Law › High Court › Alongwithwrit Petition v. Purti Parab

Alongwithwrit Petition v. Purti Parab

High Court 25 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

25 Nov 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Alongwithwrit Petition v. Purti Parab, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Digitallysigned byPURTIPURTIPRASADPRASADPARABPARABDate:2021.11.2713:02:21+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3419 OF 2019 Sharad Kumar Madhoprasad Saraf HUF V/s.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 25 (1), Mumbai & Ors. ….Petitioner…Respondents ALONGWITHWRIT PETITION NO. 3420 OF 2019 Sharad Kumar Saraf….Petitioner V/s.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 25 (1), Mumbai & Ors. …Respondents ALONGWITHWRIT PETITION NO. 3426 OF 2019 Sudarshankumar Saraf….Petitioner V/s.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 25 (1), Mumbai & Ors. …Respondents ALONGWITHWRIT PETITION NO. 3427 OF 2019 Shakuntala Sharad Kumar Saraf….Petitioner V/s.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 25 (1), Mumbai & Ors. …Respondents ---- Mr. Madhur Agrawal i/b Mr. Atul K. Jasani for Petitioner.Mr. Sham V. Walve a/w Mr. Pritish Chatterjee for Respondents-Revenue. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.DATED : 25[th] NOVEMBER 2021 P.C. : 1.After the petition was argued for some time, counsel forpetitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to take allrights and contentions including insufficient reasoning and challenge tovalidity of the notice before the concerned authority. 2. Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. (AMIT B. BORKAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.