Amar Pratap Developers Private Limited, A-21, Sadulganj, Bikaner v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Bpu), Room
High Court
18 Apr 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Amar Pratap Developers Private Limited, A-21, Sadulganj, Bikaner v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Bpu), Room
Date of order
18 Apr 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Amar Pratap Developers Private Limited, A-21, Sadulganj, Bikaner v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Bpu), Room, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Consequently, the present petition is dismissed aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1458/2022
1. Shyam Lal Chanwariya S/o Kalu Ram, Aged About 39Years, R/o Behind Shiv Mandir, Naval Basti, Shivbari,District - Bikaner, Pin - 334001 - RajasthanYears, R/o Behind Shiv Mandir, Naval Basti, Shivbari,District - Bikaner, Pin - 334001 - Rajasthan
2. Amar Pratap Developers Private Limited, A-21, SadulGanj, Bikaner Through Its Director Shri Ashok KumarModi. Age 64 Years.Ganj, Bikaner Through Its Director Shri Ashok KumarModi. Age 64 Years.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Adjudicating Authority, Prohibition Of Benami PropertyTransactions Act, 1988 (The Benami ProhibitionAmendment Act, 2016), B Wing, 9Th Floor, Lok NayakBhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi 110003Transactions Act, 1988 (The Benami ProhibitionAmendment Act, 2016), B Wing, 9Th Floor, Lok NayakBhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi 110003
2. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Bpu), Room No.103, New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Dass Road,Jaipur Rajsthan 302005.103, New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Dass Road,Jaipur Rajsthan 302005.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s)
: Mr. Pushkar Taimini
: Mr. K.K. Bissa
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATIOrder
18/04/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission towithdraw this writ petition.
Permission is granted.
Consequently, the present petition is dismissed aswithdrawn. All pending applications stand disposed of.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue