Case LawHigh Court › Amar Pratap Developers Private Limited,...

Amar Pratap Developers Private Limited, A-21, Sadulganj, Bikaner v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Bpu), Room

High Court 06 Jan 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Amar Pratap Developers Private Limited, A-21, Sadulganj, Bikaner v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Bpu), Room
Date of order
06 Jan 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Amar Pratap Developers Private Limited, A-21, Sadulganj, Bikaner v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Bpu), Room, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of the submissions made, the petition is dismissed aswithdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1471/2022 1. Pratap Singh Bawari S/o Nanak Singh Bawari, Aged About51 Years, R/o Ward No. 02, Chak 28 K.y.d., Khajuwala,District - Bikaner, Pin - 334023 - Rajasthan.51 Years, R/o Ward No. 02, Chak 28 K.y.d., Khajuwala,District - Bikaner, Pin - 334023 - Rajasthan. 2. Amar Pratap Developers Private Limited, A-21, SadulGanj, Bikaner Through Its Director Shri Ashok KumarModi. Age 64 Years.Ganj, Bikaner Through Its Director Shri Ashok KumarModi. Age 64 Years. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Adjudicating Authority, Prohibition Of Benami PropertyTransactions Act, 1988 (The Benami ProhibitionAmendment Act, 2016), B Wing, 9Th Floor, Lok NayakBhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi 110003Transactions Act, 1988 (The Benami ProhibitionAmendment Act, 2016), B Wing, 9Th Floor, Lok NayakBhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi 110003 2. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Bpu), Room No.103, New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Dass Road,Jaipur Rajsthan 302005.103, New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Dass Road,Jaipur Rajsthan 302005. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s): Mr. Pushkar Taimini.For Respondent(s): Mr. K.K. Bissa, Dy. G.C. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALIOrder 06/01/2023 An application has been filed by the petitioners seekingwithdrawal of the writ petition in view of the judgment of Hon’bleSupreme Court in Union of India & Anr. Vs. Ganpati Dealcom Pvt.Ltd.: 2022 SCC Online SC 1064 with liberty to file fresh, in case, afresh cause of action arises to the petitioners. In view of the submissions made, the petition is dismissed aswithdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. The stay application also stands disposed of. (ARUN BHANSALI),J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan